The biggest drawback of the need for large amounts of money to campaign is that:

a. people who can not raise money are denied the chance to be elected

b. candidates must use much of their own money in order to get elected

c. PACs (politcal action committees) have a hard time rasing needed funds.

d. getting money from PACs and temporary organizations is a difficult process

Well, I don't think it's B or C.
It could be A but they aren't denied the chance, they just simply don't get elected.
So would it be D? Or keep A,

Input!!

(Note the spelling of "government.")

I think you're right in keeping A.

The question is asking for the biggest drawback of the need for large amounts of money to campaign. To determine the answer, let's analyze each option:

a. People who cannot raise money are denied the chance to be elected.
This option suggests that individuals who lack the ability to raise money are denied the opportunity to be elected. However, it's important to note that although fundraising is crucial for campaigning, the lack of funds does not necessarily prevent someone from running for office. Therefore, option a. may not be the correct answer.

b. Candidates must use much of their own money in order to get elected.
This option states that candidates must use a significant amount of their personal finances to get elected. While this is often the case, it doesn't necessarily qualify as the biggest drawback. Many candidates have personal wealth or access to financial resources and choose to invest in their own campaigns.

c. PACs (political action committees) have a hard time raising needed funds.
This option suggests that PACs struggle to raise the funds required for campaigns. While this can be an issue, it is not necessarily the most significant drawback of the need for large campaign funds.

d. Getting money from PACs and temporary organizations is a difficult process.
This option highlights the challenges associated with obtaining funding from PACs and temporary organizations. This can be a significant drawback as it may limit the financial support available to campaigns, impacting their overall success.

Based on the analysis above, option d. seems to be the most appropriate answer, as it addresses the difficulties associated with obtaining financial support from PACs and temporary organizations.