I responded back to your last post that you didn't read. We can't use any statistics. I re-wrote what i had but can you please tell me what else I should put or how to make it stronger. Does it sound like I'm pro-war? I'm so confused right now. Thank you. I need to add a few more sentences but I don't know what.
First, pro-war diminishes overpopulation. Overpopulation is a great motivator for war, because during war many individuals are killed, physically resulting in a smaller population. War would eliminate the profound effects of having so many people in one area. War is recognized as a true epidemic disease because it kills more people in shorter periods of time than any other diseases. This unfolds by having less people packed into one little area without room to navigate. War would cut back on population tolls because those fighting for their country are losing their lives.
That looks good.
If I remember correctly, you're against global peace. Your argument above provides one reason for being in favor of war.
Other arguments include national pride, lack of physical resources, and need for more land.
Ya I'm against global peace but aren't I suppose to be in favor of war you said that my argument above provides one reason for being in favor of war. I appreciate your other arguements but do you have one more sentence that I can add to what I have above about pro-war and overpopulation. Thank You I have my other ones already that I'm going to use for that paragraph.
How about this concluding sentence?
War is the ultimate solution for overpopulation.
Based on the information provided, it seems like you are not necessarily expressing a strong pro-war stance, but rather discussing a potential consequence of war, which is the reduction of overpopulation. However, it is important to remember that the context of your overall argument is crucial in accurately determining your position. Without further information, it is difficult to assess your overall stance on the matter.
To strengthen your argument and provide a more balanced perspective, consider adding the following points:
1. Discussing alternative solutions: Instead of solely focusing on the benefits of war, consider mentioning alternative ways to address overpopulation, such as promoting family planning, education, or implementing sustainable development practices.
2. Addressing moral and ethical considerations: Acknowledge the ethical dilemmas associated with war and its impact on human lives. Highlight that while war may result in reduced population numbers, it often comes at a significant cost in terms of loss, suffering, and human rights violations.
3. Considering long-term effects: Explore the long-term consequences of war, including the challenges of rebuilding societies, addressing psychological trauma, and restoring stability in war-torn regions. This would provide a more comprehensive analysis of the overall impact of war on population dynamics.
Remember to support your points with evidence, examples, or logical reasoning to strengthen your argument and ensure it is well-balanced.