Can anybody help answer one or all of these questions? I'm dying here.
Even though the First International died out by 1872, what lessons were learned with regards to workers' liberalsm? What is anarchism? Who were their greatest supporters? How were anarchists different in philosophy and practice from the Marxists and other socialists of the late 19th century? Does anarchism offer useful components to be integrated in modern European politics?
Let's start with anarchism.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/anarchism
From that definition, what do you think the answers are for your other questions?
We'll be glad to comment on your answers.
I'm really struggling on the first question.
I searched but I'm not sure if what I'm finding is even close to the answer. But I think anarchism may be different from Marxism and such in the fact that Marx and Engels had socialist ideals in which government was obsolete and property was dispersed equally but they didn't exactly use violence to bring about there cause which, from that definition, it seems that's what anarchism implies.
The First International believed that if the workers owned the means of production, that they'd receive fair wages and decent treatment and hours. Before then, workers were treated as just so many cogs in the machine to produce for the owners' benefits. In that sense, the early Marxists were anarchists. They wanted to overthrow the government and let the workers rule.
However their idealistic notions were not practical. No community has ever been successful or even possible with NO government. The essence of anarchism is no government.
The socialist ideal is one in which committees of workers form the government and distribute goods according to the workers' needs.
so then the final question is no?
because anarchism cannot really offer usefullness to present day European politics because they desire no government whatsoever?
I agree. I don't see how anarchism is useful in today's European government.
Thank you :) you're such a big help.
i've been struggling on this question for like a week now, no lie. i went on vacation and missed a bunch of school so it was really hard to catch up.
I'd be happy to help answer your questions! Let's tackle them one by one.
1. Lesson learned from the First International and workers' liberalism:
To understand the lessons learned from the First International, it's important to know that it was a federation of labor unions and socialist political parties formed in 1864. While it disbanded in 1872, it laid the groundwork for future workers' movements. Some lessons learned include the importance of international solidarity among workers, the need for worker representation and rights, and the recognition of the class struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie.
2. Anarchism:
Anarchism is a political and social philosophy that advocates for the absence of governmental authority and the abolition of hierarchies and coercive systems. Anarchists believe in the self-governance of individuals and communities through voluntary cooperation and mutual aid. They oppose all forms of institutional power, including the state, capitalism, and other oppressive hierarchical structures.
3. Greatest supporters of anarchism:
Throughout history, anarchism has had a diverse range of supporters. Some notable figures include Mikhail Bakunin, Peter Kropotkin, Emma Goldman, Errico Malatesta, and Nestor Makhno. These individuals played vital roles in promoting and advancing anarchist ideas through their writings, activism, and involvement in various movements.
4. Differences between anarchists and Marxists/socialists of the late 19th century:
While anarchists and Marxists/socialists shared some common goals, there were notable differences in philosophy and practice. Anarchists believed in the immediate abolition of the state and rejected the idea of a transitional socialist state, which was a central aspect of Marxist theory. Anarchists emphasized the importance of individual freedom and direct action, while many socialists focused on centralized state power and political parties.
5. Relevance of anarchism in modern European politics:
Anarchism continues to offer relevant components for integration into modern European politics. The principles of decentralization, direct democracy, voluntary cooperation, and opposition to hierarchies resonate with movements advocating for alternative models of governance. Anarchist ideas have influenced various grassroots and horizontal movements, environmental activism, and community-based organizing. However, it's important to note that anarchism, like any ideology, has its complexities and different interpretations, so its practical application varies.
Remember, these answers provide an overview, and further exploration of each topic will yield a deeper understanding.