Based on a reigious viewpoint why is using human embryonic stem cells from embryos wrong?

It's like murder. Your killing something that is living.

The viewpoint is determined by when human life is assumed to begin. For those who assume it begins at conception, the use of embryos for stem cells is murder.

However, other people believe that human life does not begin until the fetus is viable (it has at least even chances of surviving outside the womb), usually before about 6 months prenatal. To those people, it would not be murder.

I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.

Explaining the religious viewpoint on using human embryonic stem cells can be complex, as different religious traditions hold varying beliefs and perspectives on the matter. However, I will provide a general understanding from a religious standpoint.

In many religious traditions, human life is considered sacred and is believed to begin at conception or fertilization. This belief forms the basis for objections to the use of human embryonic stem cells because their extraction typically involves the destruction of the embryo. From a religious perspective, this destruction is seen as taking a human life, which is considered morally wrong.

To understand why using human embryonic stem cells from embryos is perceived as wrong, one needs to grasp the following steps:

1. Recognize the religious belief: Understand that different religious traditions, such as Roman Catholicism, certain branches of Islam, and some evangelical Protestant denominations, consider the embryo to be a human life that should be protected.

2. Acknowledge the viewpoint on personhood: According to some religious beliefs, personhood begins at conception, meaning that destroying an embryo is considered equivalent to ending a human life.

3. Consider the ethics of destruction: The use of human embryonic stem cells often requires the destruction of embryos, which is seen as morally problematic in religious contexts. This stems from the idea that life is sacred and shouldn't be intentionally terminated or compromised.

4. Value alternatives: From a religious perspective, exploring and utilizing alternative sources of stem cells, such as adult stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), may be viewed as more ethically acceptable. These alternatives do not involve the destruction of embryos and can still provide valuable medical advancements.

It's important to note that these religious beliefs may not be universally held, and opinions on this matter can vary even within religious communities. Additionally, views on the use of embryonic stem cells may also be influenced by scientific, ethical, and philosophical considerations beyond religious beliefs.