If there is a recursively defined sequence such that

a1 = sqrt(2)
an + 1 = sqrt(2 + an)

Show that an < 2 for all n ≥ 1

a1 = √2

a2 = √(2 + √2)
a3 = √(2 + √(2 + √2))
I see a pattern

an = √( 2 + √(2 + ...

let x = √( 2 + √(2 + ...
square both sides, that will drop the left-most √ on the right side

x^2 = 2 + √( 2 + √(2 + ...
x^2 - 2 = √( 2 + √(2 + ...
but the right side is what I originally defined as x
so
x^2 - 2 = x
x^2 - x - 2 = 0
(x-2)(x+1) = 0
x = 2 or x=-1
(clearly x = -1 is an extraneous solution)

so an must have a limit of 2.
and since n is a finite number, term an < 2 .

an interesting loop on the calculator is this

1) enter √2
2) press =
3) plus 2
4) press =
5) press √
6) repeat step 2)

You should get appr 2 correct to 5 decimals after about 10 iterations.

You prove that the sequences converges to 2, but you don't necessarily prove that it will never exceed 2...

Thanks for the great help though

I proved that its limit is 2

i.e. it will actually never reach 2, only if I take all of its infinite terms.
so clearly it can never exceed 2 if it can't reach 2.

You are absolutely correct. Thanks so much for the help on this!

I'd love to pay you guys back for this service :)

The only thing missing here is that you must show that the series is monotonously increasing, i.e. that

a_{n+1} > a_{n} (that should be easy). This, combined with the fact that the limit is 2 proves that a_n < 2.

If you have a sequence that is not monotonously increasing (or decreasing), it isn't necesarily true that the limiting value isn't attained for finite n. Take e.g. the sequence

sin(pi n/7)/n

which tends to zero, but it is also equal to zero for n a multiple of 7.

Brianna arrived at county fair at 10:25. she left at 11:40. how long was she at the fair?

To prove that an < 2 for all n ≥ 1, we can use mathematical induction.

Step 1: Base Case (n = 1)
For the base case, we need to show that a1 = sqrt(2) < 2. Since the square root of 2 is approximately 1.414, which is less than 2, the base case holds true.

Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis
Assume that for some positive integer k ≥ 1, ak < 2 is true.

Step 3: Inductive Step
We need to show that ak+1 < 2 is also true based on the assumption in Step 2.

Using the recursive formula, we have:
ak+1 = sqrt(2 + ak)

Since ak < 2 (based on the inductive hypothesis), we can substitute ak < 2 into the formula:
ak+1 = sqrt(2 + ak) < sqrt(2 + 2) = sqrt(4) = 2

Therefore, ak+1 < 2 is true.

Step 4: Conclusion
By mathematical induction, we have shown that an < 2 for all n ≥ 1.