I need help with this history question:

senate opponents of the league of nations as proposed in the treaty of versailles argued that it

a) failed to provide any german financial reparatins for the US

b) violated wilson's own fourteen points

c) robbed congress of its war-declaring powers

d) isolated the united states from postwar world affairs

Check this site to find the correct answer.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1338.html

i still don't know the answer after reading the article

answer is c when it references in the article that us troops would have to fight under foriegn commanders

To answer this history question, we need to analyze the arguments of the Senate opponents of the League of Nations as proposed in the Treaty of Versailles. Let's break down each option and see which one aligns with their arguments.

a) Failed to provide any German financial reparations for the US:
This option refers to the issue of financial reparations from Germany to the United States. While financial reparations were indeed a topic of discussion during the negotiation of the Treaty of Versailles, it wasn't the primary concern of the Senate opponents of the League of Nations. Therefore, this option is less likely to be the correct answer.

b) Violated Wilson's own fourteen points:
Woodrow Wilson's "Fourteen Points" were his proposed principles for peace negotiations to end World War I. While some Senate opponents did argue that the League of Nations as proposed in the Treaty of Versailles contradicted Wilson's Fourteen Points, it wasn't the main focus of their opposition. So, this option is not the most relevant answer.

c) Robbed Congress of its war-declaring powers:
This option addresses the concern raised by opponents of the League of Nations regarding the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government. Some senators believed that by joining the League of Nations, Congress would lose its constitutional authority to declare war, as the League could potentially lead the United States into conflicts without congressional approval. This argument resonated with many Senate opponents, making it a strong contender for the correct answer.

d) Isolated the United States from postwar world affairs:
This option reflects the concern raised by some Senate opponents that joining the League of Nations would restrict the United States' ability to pursue its own foreign policy and make independent decisions on international matters. While this argument was indeed expressed by opponents, it wasn't as central to their opposition as the issue of war-declaring powers. Therefore, this option is less likely to be the correct answer.

Based on the analysis, the argument that most accurately represents the views of the Senate opponents of the League of Nations as proposed in the Treaty of Versailles is:

c) Robbed Congress of its war-declaring powers