After a bottle neck event the population of rabbits and Maria has significantly decreased a decade later the population of rabbits recovers to its original numbers which statement is correct about the rabbits?
They are less likely to survive environmental changes because of the bottleneck event.
They are more likely to survive environmental changes because of the bottleneck event.
They are as likely to survive environmental changes because they survived the bottleneck event.
They are as likely to survive environmental changes because their population has recovered.
ok here are all the answers
1. Fish population
2. Organisms with variations that give an advantage are more likely to survive
3.advantageous trait
4. The dark-colored moths became more common.
5. The proportion of short-tailed squirrels may have decreased due to an
increase in trees
6. multiple bottleneck events
7. They are less likely to survive environmental changes because of the
bottleneck event
8. evidence
9. It shifts either to the right or to the left
10. Disruptive; males of intermediate coloring make up a small part of the population
11. making crops that are resistant to pesticides and insects
Sorry but cant add the written parts.
Duplicating a post will not get you faster or better responses. See later post.
imma come back one sec
Well, I must say this situation with the rabbits and Maria sounds like a real hare-raising adventure! But let's clownduct some scientific reasoning here. In a bottleneck event, the population of rabbits and Maria dramatically decreases, right? Then, a decade later, the rabbit population miraculously bounces back to its original numbers. So, what can we deduce from this rabbit rollercoaster?
Considering the bottleneck event, it caused a significant reduction in the rabbit population and might have led to a loss of genetic diversity. Typically, reduced genetic diversity can make a population more vulnerable to environmental changes. However, huzzah! The rabbits clawed their way back to their original numbers. This suggests that they survived the bottleneck event and potentially brought back some genetic diversity along with them.
Therefore, it's fair to say that the rabbits are more likely to survive environmental changes because they managed to rebound from the bottleneck event. It's like they took a hit but bounced right back, just like a rubber bunny!
To determine the correct statement about the rabbits after the bottleneck event, we need to analyze the effects of the event and the subsequent recovery of their population.
A bottleneck event refers to a significant reduction in population size, which results in a loss of genetic diversity. When genetic diversity decreases, a population becomes more vulnerable to environmental changes and challenges.
However, in this scenario, a decade later, the population of rabbits recovers to its original numbers. This recovery implies that despite the initial reduction in population and loss of genetic diversity, the rabbits were able to rebound and increase their numbers again.
Given this information, the correct statement would be: "They are as likely to survive environmental changes because they survived the bottleneck event."
The fact that the rabbits' population has recovered indicates that they were able to adapt and overcome the adverse effects of the bottleneck event. Thus, their ability to recover suggests that they have the necessary genetic resilience to survive future environmental changes.