Please check my answer!! Asap
The purpose of state appellate courts is to make sure that lower state courts have followed the due process of the law and court procedure. What principle best reflects this action of the courts? *
A. popular sovereignty
B. checks and balances?*
C. separation of powers?
D. judicial review
I think it’s either b or c.
To check if your answer is correct, let's go through the options and assess which one aligns best with the purpose of state appellate courts.
A. Popular sovereignty: This principle emphasizes the authority and power of the people. However, it is not directly related to the purpose of state appellate courts, which primarily focus on reviewing legal procedures and ensuring due process.
B. Checks and balances: This principle describes the system in which different branches of government have the ability to limit or oversee the actions of others. State appellate courts help maintain checks and balances by reviewing the decisions made by lower state courts to ensure they have followed proper legal procedures and due process. Therefore, this option is a potential match.
C. Separation of powers: This principle refers to the division of government authority among different branches. State appellate courts do not directly relate to the separation of powers, as their purpose is to review lower court decisions rather than dividing governmental authority.
D. Judicial review: This principle refers to the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate laws or actions that are deemed unconstitutional. While state appellate courts have the authority to review lower court decisions, their primary focus is on ensuring procedural fairness rather than evaluating the constitutionality of laws or actions.
Based on the analysis above, the option that best reflects the purpose of state appellate courts is B. Checks and balances. Therefore, your initial thought was correct, and your answer appears to be accurate.