. Why has the United States been reluctant to take action on climate change?
a. The global community has failed to produce climate agreement.
b. Scientists disagree upon the best way to combat the issue.
c. It has become a political issue in which one party does not believe it either to be pressing or will have an economic impact too great to justify adjustments supported by the scientific community. ****
d. The United Nations has barred America from reducing emissions.
I expect C is the answer they want, but it is biased against the party resisting action. It also assumes that there is in fact a consensus in the scientific community.
The other three answers don't seem to fit.
yeah i agree they want you to put c
The correct answer is:
c. It has become a political issue in which one party does not believe it either to be pressing or will have an economic impact too great to justify adjustments supported by the scientific community.
The United States has been reluctant to take action on climate change primarily because it has become a political issue. This is because one party in the country does not believe that climate change is a pressing issue or they believe that the economic impact of taking action would be too great. This position is not supported by the scientific community, which has provided extensive evidence of the urgent need to address climate change.
To understand why the United States has been reluctant to take action on climate change, it is important to consider the political dynamics within the country. Climate change has become a highly polarized issue, with different political parties having opposing views on the matter. One party, often associated with conservative viewpoints, has been hesitant to acknowledge the urgency of climate change or commit to actions to mitigate its impacts.
These political disagreements have often resulted in policy gridlock and a lack of substantial action on climate change at the federal level in the United States. This reluctance to take action has been a source of frustration for those who advocate for more aggressive measures to address climate change.
It is worth noting that this answer is specific to the United States context and may differ in other countries. Additionally, it is important to recognize that public opinion and political dynamics can evolve over time, so the stance on climate change may not be static.