Do you consider the major crimes listed in the FBI crime index to be male in se?
I would say that they are both male in se and male in prohibita considering the major crimes are both illegal by law and wrong in itself. Could I be wrong here? Would any of the major crimes be considered natural crimes and not legal crimes? Or are they considered both?
I guess I will just ask elsewhere......
Ok. But make sure you spell the words correctly. Isn't it mala se, mala prohibita?
The concept of "male in se" and "male in prohibita" relates to legal philosophy and the categorization of crimes. "Male in se" refers to acts that are inherently wrong or evil, regardless of whether they are legally prohibited. On the other hand, "male in prohibita" refers to acts that are only considered wrong because they are prohibited by law.
Now, to address your question about the major crimes listed in the FBI crime index, it's important to note that the FBI crime index includes both violent crimes (such as murder, , robbery) and property crimes (such as burglary, theft, arson), among others. These crimes are considered illegal and wrong according to the legal framework in the United States.
However, whether they are also inherently wrong or evil (male in se) is a subjective judgment that varies depending on the ethical, moral, and cultural perspectives one holds. Different societies and individuals may have different views on the morality of certain actions, even if they are prohibited by law.
So, it is possible for the major crimes listed in the FBI crime index to be considered both male in se (inherently wrong) and male in prohibita (wrong due to legal prohibition), although these judgments depend on individual and societal beliefs.