The Senate In reality has no real job. Yes, the senates can disapprove or approve any piece of government legislation. If however the House of Common disagrees then they over rule the senates. If the prime minister loses the support of the House of Commons or the cabinet then he must resign. If the prime Minister losses the support from the senates it is like nothing happened. The prime Minster does not really care because that does not affect him in anyway shape or form. No, one really takes the senates seriously. The senate gives voice to provinces, why is it that many people do not support them? The senates have no real position; they are there just because.
Senates can give their opinion but in reality their opinion will not be taken into consideration. For example in September 1990 everyone questioned the senate’s and ignored what they had to say about GST. The prime minister told the senate that they should not block the wishes of the House of Commons. This reinforces my opinion because the senates may try to be important but the government does not need the senates. I am not denying that the senates have not done a lot of investigation of political and social issues that Canada faces. However this job can be filled by Royal commissions or public inquiries. The government would be the way it is today with or with out the senates.
Should the Canadian senate be abolished? Is an important issue because this decides “whether the senators should be elected or appointed (and by whom), what regions groups or people they should represent, and what powers they should have.The senates can voice their opinions but their voice will not be heard. The House of Commons can overrule the senates meaning that senates are not really needed. The senates do not have public support. The prime Minster himself even accused the senates of blocking the wishes of the House of Commons. Meaning the prime Minster does not support the senates. I stand by my opinion the Canadian senate should be abolished
I just skimmed through it, but I think you should revise the part in the first paragraph that says "they are just there because"
Also, in the last paragraph, I think you should put "it" between is and an.
The word Senate should probably be capitalized throughout the essay.
There are some spelling mistakes you should fix as well.
Based on the text you provided, it seems that you are discussing the role and significance of the Canadian Senate. You argue that the Senate has no real job and its opinions are often ignored. You question why many people do not support the Senate and suggest that it should be abolished.
To address your concerns and understand the issue better, let me explain the role and function of the Canadian Senate.
The Canadian Senate is one of the two chambers of Parliament, the other being the House of Commons. It is a legislative body whose members, known as senators, are appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Senate is responsible for reviewing and potentially amending legislation proposed by the House of Commons.
While it is true that the Senate has the power to approve or disapprove government legislation, the Senate's power is not equal to that of the House of Commons. Ultimately, if the House of Commons disagrees with the Senate's decision, it can overrule the Senate. This dynamic is a result of Canada's parliamentary system, where the House of Commons holds more power since it is elected by the people.
You mention that if the Prime Minister loses the support of the House of Commons or the Cabinet, they must resign. However, if the Prime Minister loses the support of the Senate, it does not have the same impact. This is because the Senate's role is primarily to provide a platform for regional representation and debate, rather than directly influencing the composition of the government.
The Senate gives voice to the provinces and serves as a forum for discussions on political and social issues. While some argue that the Senate provides valuable input, others question its effectiveness and representation. The appointment process and the fact that senators are not elected can lead to criticisms of democratic legitimacy.
The issue of whether the Canadian Senate should be abolished or reformed is an important one. The debate revolves around questions of whether senators should be elected or appointed, who they should represent, and what powers they should have. Supporters of the Senate argue that it provides a counterbalance to the House of Commons and safeguards regional interests. On the other hand, critics argue that the Senate is ineffective, outdated, and lacks public support.
In conclusion, while the Canadian Senate may not hold the same level of power as the House of Commons, it serves as a platform for regional representation and debate. The question of whether the Senate should be abolished or reformed is an important issue that involves considerations of democratic legitimacy, regional representation, and the balance of power within the Canadian political system.