Early civilizations, such as Mohenjo Daro and Harappa, settled near the Indus River. Which of the following is NOT an advantage of settling near a river?
Increased trade
Increased trade
Defensive barrier
Defensive barrier
Destruction from flooding
Destruction from flooding
Improved agriculture
Improved agriculture
A flooded field can be an advantage if at the right time growing rice, but is usually not desired particularly if you have to swim.
The advantage that is not linked to settling near a river is "Destruction from flooding." Settlements near rivers generally offer several advantages, but flooding can indeed be a disadvantage. Flooding can cause destruction to crops, infrastructure, and settlements, leading to significant loss of life and property. However, the other options, increased trade, defensive barrier, and improved agriculture are advantages typically associated with settling near a river.
To determine this answer, you can eliminate the options one by one by understanding the advantages and disadvantages of settling near a river. Increased trade is a benefit because rivers serve as natural transportation routes, allowing for the movement of goods and fostering trade. A river can also act as a natural defensive barrier, making it easier to protect settlements from potential invaders. Additionally, settling near a river provides access to water for irrigation, allowing for improved agriculture.
Therefore, the correct answer is "Destruction from flooding" because it is the only option that does not represent an advantage of settling near a river.