The Senate In reality has no real job. Yes, the senates can disapprove or approve any piece of government legislation. If however the House of Common disagrees then they over rule the senates. If the prime minister loses the support of the House of Commons or the cabinet then he must resign. If the prime Minister losses the support from the senates it is like nothing happened. The prime Minster does not really care because that does not affect him in anyway shape or form. No, one really takes the senates seriously. The senate gives voice to provinces, why is it that many people do not support them? The senates have no real position; they are there just because.

Senates can give their opinion but in reality their opinion will not be taken into consideration. For example in September 1990 everyone questioned the senate’s and ignored what they had to say about GST. The prime minister told the senate that they should not block the wishes of the House of Commons. This reinforces my opinion because the senates may try to be important but the government does not need the senates. I am not denying that the senates have not done a lot of investigation of political and social issues that Canada faces. However this job can be filled by Royal commissions or public inquiries. The government would be the way it is today with or with out the senates.

Should the Canadian senate be abolished? Is an important issue because this decides “whether the senators should be elected or appointed (and by whom), what regions groups or people they should represent, and what powers they should have.The senates can voice their opinions but their voice will not be heard. The House of Commons can overrule the senates meaning that senates are not really needed. The senates do not have public support. The prime Minster himself even accused the senates of blocking the wishes of the House of Commons. Meaning the prime Minster does not support the senates. I stand by my opinion the Canadian senate should be abolished

thanks in advance!!!

It seems like you have a strong opinion about the Canadian Senate and believe that it has no real purpose or influence in the government. However, I'd like to provide a more comprehensive explanation of the Senate's role in order to help you understand why some people support its existence.

Firstly, the Canadian Senate acts as a chamber of "sober second thought," meaning its purpose is to review and potentially revise legislation proposed by the House of Commons. While it is true that the House of Commons has the ultimate authority to approve or disapprove legislation, the Senate plays a crucial role in examining bills from a different perspective. Its members, known as Senators, are appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister, and they are meant to represent regional and provincial interests that may not always align with those of the House of Commons.

The power of the Senate lies in its ability to provide a check on potentially hasty or ill-considered decisions made by the elected members of the House of Commons. By proposing amendments or suggesting modifications to legislation, the Senate can contribute to a more thorough examination of proposed laws, ensuring that they are fair, just, and well thought out. The Senate's ability to scrutinize legislation helps to prevent any potential abuses of power by the majority party in the House of Commons.

Furthermore, the Senate serves as a platform to represent minority or underrepresented groups and regions within Canada. Senators are appointed to represent specific provinces or territories, which allows for the diverse perspectives of different regions to be taken into account during legislative debates. This regional representation can help ensure that the interests of all Canadians, regardless of population size, are considered in the decision-making process.

Although it is true that the Senate's recommendations can be overruled by the House of Commons, the Senate's role in providing a forum for debate and careful consideration of legislation should not be overlooked. Additionally, while there have been instances where the Senate's opinions have been disregarded by the government, there have also been cases where the Senate's amendments have led to significant improvements in proposed laws.

In conclusion, the question of whether the Canadian Senate should be abolished is a complex and divisive issue. While some argue that the Senate is redundant and lacks influence, others believe it serves an important role in providing a second look at legislation and representing regional interests. Ultimately, the decision on the Senate's future would require careful consideration of potential alternatives and the democratic principles that underpin Canada's political system.