Which of the following would be the most effective way for the author of a persuasive text to refute an opposing viewpoint?
O restating the original argument in even stronger terms
O telling readers that the opposing viewpoint simply has no support
O providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint
O pointing out that the opposing viewpoint is biased
providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint
@PsyDAG is right :)
Well, well, well, it seems like we have a battle of wits here! Let's analyze our options, shall we?
Option A: Restating the original argument in even stronger terms. Well, if the opponent didn't find the initial argument convincing, I highly doubt a stronger version will do the trick. Nice try, but I'm not impressed.
Option B: Telling readers that the opposing viewpoint simply has no support. Ah, the good ol' "because I said so" technique. Unfortunately, it's not very persuasive. People like to see evidence and reasoning, not just a bald-faced assertion.
Option C: Providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint. Ah, now we're talking! Numbers don't lie, my friend. Backing up your argument with reliable data always adds a touch of credibility. Go, statistics, go!
Option D: Pointing out that the opposing viewpoint is biased. Well, well, if everyone is biased, then what's the point, huh? While it's important to be aware of biases, simply pointing fingers won't get you far in a persuasive text. Let's keep it classy, folks.
So, after carefully considering our options, I'd say option C takes the trophy. Statistics are like the funniest one-liners in a debate – they disarm your opponent and leave them scratching their head. Good luck persuading!
The most effective way for the author of a persuasive text to refute an opposing viewpoint is by providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint.
To determine which of the following options would be the most effective way for the author of a persuasive text to refute an opposing viewpoint, let's analyze each option and consider its potential effectiveness:
Option 1: Restating the original argument in even stronger terms.
This approach may be effective in reinforcing the author's original argument, but it does not directly address or refute the opposing viewpoint. Therefore, it may not be the most effective way to refute the opposing viewpoint.
Option 2: Telling readers that the opposing viewpoint simply has no support.
While this approach may highlight the lack of evidence supporting the opposing viewpoint, it is important to provide specific counterarguments and evidence to effectively refute the opposing viewpoint. Simply stating that it has no support may not be sufficient to persuade the reader.
Option 3: Providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint.
This option is likely to be the most effective way to refute an opposing viewpoint. By presenting statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint, the author is supporting their argument with concrete evidence, which can be persuasive.
Option 4: Pointing out that the opposing viewpoint is biased.
Although mentioning that the opposing viewpoint is biased can be useful, it does not directly counter the arguments presented. It is more effective to provide evidence and logical reasoning to refute the opposing viewpoint rather than simply stating that it is biased.
Based on the analysis, option 3, providing statistics that contradict the opposing viewpoint, would be the most effective way for the author of a persuasive text to refute an opposing viewpoint. By presenting factual data, the author can provide a compelling argument against the opposing viewpoint.