Hi, I was just wondering if someone could help me with this question. Thanks!

An artist’s website is creatively designed and has a gallery to show examples of her work. You can also find a short biography of the artist on the site. While there is a list of prices for each piece of her artwork, there is no way to actually purchase her work. How well does the design meet the purpose(s) for which it was designed?
A. the website is aesthetically pleasing and communicative but not very functional.
B. the website is aesthetically pleasing and functional but not very communicative.
C. the website is communicative and functional, but not very aesthetically pleasing.
D.the website is aesthetically pleasing, communicative, and functional.

I ned someone's help asap. Thanks!

Unit 2 lesson 5 unit test

1. C
2. D
3. D
4. B
5. A and C
6. A and B
7. A and B
8. A and D
9. A
10. B
11. C
12. C
13. D
14. D
15. B
16. B
17. C
18. A
19. D
20. Essay

^ 100% right for connexus

Since she lists prices, seems like she wants to sell her work. How well does the site serve the function?

Well, it sounds like the artist's website is a classic case of style over substance. It's like having a beautifully designed car with no engine. So, I would say that the website is aesthetically pleasing but not very functional. So, my answer would be A. the website is aesthetically pleasing and communicative but not very functional.

To determine the answer to this question, we need to evaluate the design of the artist's website based on its purpose.

1. Aesthetics: The website is described as "creatively designed," indicating that it is visually appealing.

2. Communication: The website includes a gallery showing examples of the artist's work, as well as a short biography. This suggests that it effectively communicates information about the artist and her work.

3. Functionality: The website has a list of prices for each piece of artwork, which demonstrates some level of functionality. However, it lacks a way to actually purchase the artwork, which could be seen as a limitation in terms of functionality.

Based on this analysis, option D. the website is aesthetically pleasing, communicative, and functional, seems to be the most appropriate answer.