Why did Republicans in Congress opposed Lincoln’s Ten Percent Plan?
They worried that it was too harsh.
They felt it was too easy on the South.******
They believed it would make Reconstruction take too long.
They were concerned Southerners would not have enough representation in Congress.
What was the key difference between Lincoln’s and Johnson’s Reconstruction plans?
Lincoln’s plan granted amnesty to all Confederate soldiers and leaders, while Johnson’s granted no amnesty.
Johnson’s plan called for 10 percent of voters to pledge loyalty to the Union, while Lincoln’s plan required a majority vote.
Lincoln’s plan required states to abolish slavery, while Johnson’s did not.
Johnson’s plan allowed for voters in the South to elect former Confederate leaders, while Lincoln’s plan excluded Confederate leaders from government offices.****** not sure
I got them both right.
Students should never post anything here that has a tight deadline. Tutors here are not on schedules.
It would really help if you numbered your questions and used letters to indicate answer choices. References to these questions are difficult without some demarcation.
I agree with you about the first one. I don't know about the next one; you'll need to check your text or wait for another tutor.
Very GOOD!!
To understand why Republicans in Congress opposed Lincoln's Ten Percent Plan, we can look at the historical context and principles of the Republican Party at that time.
During the Reconstruction era following the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln proposed the Ten Percent Plan in December 1863. The plan aimed to reintegrate the Southern states that had seceded from the Union back into the United States. It was based on the principle of leniency towards the South, in an effort to promote national unity and reconciliation.
However, many Republicans in Congress, particularly the Radical Republicans, opposed Lincoln's plan because they felt it was too easy on the South and didn't adequately address the issue of slavery and civil rights. The Radical Republicans believed in a harsher approach towards the Southern states, seeking to ensure that newly emancipated slaves would have equal rights and protections under the law.
The key difference between Lincoln's and Johnson's Reconstruction plans can be understood by examining the goals and strategies of both presidents.
Lincoln's plan, as mentioned before, focused on achieving a swift reunification of the Union and granting amnesty to all Confederate soldiers and leaders. He required that 10 percent of eligible voters in each Confederate state take an oath of loyalty to the Union, and once that threshold was met, the state could form a new government.
On the other hand, Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln as president after his assassination, pursued a more lenient approach towards the Southern states. His plan of Reconstruction, known as Presidential Reconstruction, allowed Southern states to establish new governments and revoke their secession ordinances by taking an oath of allegiance to the Union and ratifying the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery. Additionally, Johnson's plan allowed for voters in the South to elect former Confederate leaders and allowed for Southern states to ignore civil rights protections for African Americans.
Therefore, the key difference between Lincoln's and Johnson's plans is that Johnson's plan allowed former Confederate leaders to hold public office, while Lincoln's plan excluded them. This key difference reflects the different priorities and approaches of the two presidents towards Reconstruction and the treatment of the defeated Confederacy.