How did the Compromise of 1850 cause tensions between northerners and southerners?
a. Voters south of the original Missouri Compromise line lost more slave territory to the North with the addition of New Mexico and Utah.
b. Voters north of the original Missouri Compromise line could decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.****
c. It allowed the slave trade to continue in Washington D.C.
d. It allowed northerners to protect slaves who had escaped to the north.
What is the significance of the Free-Soil Party in the election of 1848?
a. The new political party called for a ban on slavery in the new territories and their success showed that slavery had become a national issue.****
b. The new political party called for separation of the Northern free states and the Southern slave states and their failure led to the creation of the Confederacy.
c. The new political party called for abolition of slavery across the United States and their success showed how the country was moving away from using slavery.
d. The new political party called for Southerners to be able to choose to spread slavery and their failure showed the division the country continued to face.
What is the significance of the Free-Soil Party in the election of 1848? sorry that was the second q
1. No
https://www.google.com/search?q=compromise%20of%201850
2. Yes
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Free-Soil-Party
Yes
To answer the first question, the Compromise of 1850 caused tensions between northerners and southerners primarily because of option b, which is that voters north of the original Missouri Compromise line could decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.
Here's an explanation of how to arrive at this answer:
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of laws that aimed to settle the territorial and slavery disputes between states. One of the major components of this compromise was the idea of popular sovereignty, which allowed residents of a territory to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. This meant that voters would have the power to determine whether slavery would be legal or not in these territories.
This provision caused tensions between northerners and southerners because it effectively overturned the previous Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had established a set line, known as the 36°30' parallel, where slavery would be allowed. The new compromise extended the potential spread of slavery into territories that were previously designated as "free" under the Missouri Compromise. This upset many northerners as they viewed this as an expansion of slavery into areas where it had previously been prohibited. Southerners, on the other hand, saw this as an opportunity to expand slavery into new territories and maintain the balance of power between free and slave states.
As for the second question, the significance of the Free-Soil Party in the election of 1848 was that they called for a ban on slavery in the new territories, and their success showed that slavery had become a national issue.
To understand this, it's important to know the context of the election of 1848. The Free-Soil Party emerged as a political party during this time, primarily focusing on the issue of slavery. They opposed the expansion of slavery into the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. Their platform called for the prohibition of slavery in these territories.
The significance of the Free-Soil Party in the election of 1848 was that they successfully gained significant support and were able to influence the outcome of the election. Although they did not win the presidency, their performance showed that slavery had become a national issue and that there was growing opposition to the expansion of slavery. This highlighted the increasing polarization between the North and the South over the issue of slavery and set the stage for the intense debates and conflicts that would follow in the coming years leading up to the Civil War.