1. What was a big difference between the Texas Constitution of 1836 and the Texas Constitution?
2. After analyzing the similarities and differences of the U.S. Constitution and the Texas Constitution of 1845, what conclusion can be made?
3. why does the current Constitution of Texas divided power in the executive branch
I know this is super late but here are the answers for anyone else that might need them.
1. D. The constitution of 1836 was the constitution of an independent republic, and the Constitution of 1845 was the constitution of a state.
2. B. Both constitutions were more alike than different in their goals
3. A. This guarantees that no individual or agency has more power than another.
4. Freedom of speech means people are free to express their beliefs even in nonverbal ways
5. A & B It is the citizens’ responsibility to shape the direction of government. It gives the citizens a chance to have a voice in the way society is governed.
6. A. Volunteer at a homeless shelter.
7. D. Liberals and conservatives
8.A. Democrats represented Liberal causes while Republicans represented more conservative ideas
9. B & C. Clean rivers and streams. Healthcare for the needy
10. B & C It maintained legal standards for lobbyists. It investigated complaints.
11. B. established Medicare and Medicaid programs
12. D. Sam Rayburn
13. B. He was never elected to a public office.
14. C. Provides local administration for the state.
15. B. In a strong-mayor government, power is given to an executive, and in a weak-mayor government, city council has more power.
16. A. The judicial branch deals with the court system, while the executive deals with governing officials
For 17 and 18, I'll give you the information found on the study guide as a reference. Please make sure you use your own words, otherwise you’ll be copying what the study guide says. Oh, and if you want to see if the answers, I gave for 1-16 are correct, (though I can assure you they are) you can also check the study guide, the answers are in bold. <3
17. ●Texas constitutions were usually modeled after US. ●The Texas Constitution calls for a separation of powers among the three branches of government. ●Rather than create a strong executive branch, the Texas Constitution limits the governor’s power to give jobs to associates. This guarantees that no individual or agency has more power than another. ●The Supreme Court said flag burning is justified as a form of free speech ●The Court ruled that flag burning is protected because “speech” applies to many different forms of expression.
18. The Tidelands were a 10.5-mile-wide strip along the Gulf Coast that contained rich oil deposits. Texas had claimed it since the days of the Republic of Texas. •The federal government claimed the land and denied Texas the right to lease its coastal waters to oil companies for offshore drilling. •This issue and loss of revenue turned Texans against Truman. Texas had always been strongly Democratic, but the Republican candidate for president (Truman's opponent) was able to carry the state in the 1952 election because he supported the state’s point of view in the Tidelands Controversy. •This began the downfall of the Democratic Party in TX.
Thank you for providing the answers to the questions!
How do you say "Front End Associate" in spanish?
"Front End Associate" can be translated to "Asociado de la línea de caja."
1. To find the differences between the Texas Constitution of 1836 and the Texas Constitution, you can compare the text of both documents. The Texas Constitution of 1836 was the first constitution adopted by the Republic of Texas after its independence from Mexico. On the other hand, the Texas Constitution refers to the current constitution in place today.
Some notable differences between the two constitutions include:
- Structure: The Texas Constitution of 1836 had two main sections, a bill of rights and a constitution. In contrast, the current Texas Constitution is organized into several articles, covering various areas of governance.
- Length: The Texas Constitution of 1836 was relatively short, with only about 6,500 words. The current Texas Constitution, however, is significantly longer and more detailed, with approximately 87,000 words.
- Powers: The Texas Constitution of 1836 granted broad powers to the president, including the ability to appoint and remove executive officers. The current Texas Constitution, on the other hand, limits executive powers and emphasizes a system of checks and balances between branches of government.
- Slavery: The Texas Constitution of 1836 allowed for slavery, while the current Texas Constitution prohibits slavery.
2. To analyze the similarities and differences between the U.S. Constitution and the Texas Constitution of 1845, you can compare the two documents.
Some similarities include:
- Bill of Rights: Both the U.S. Constitution and the Texas Constitution of 1845 contain a bill of rights outlining individual liberties and protections.
- Separation of Powers: Both constitutions establish a separation of powers among three branches of government – executive, legislative, and judicial.
Some differences include:
- Structure: The U.S. Constitution is a more concise and broader document, while the Texas Constitution of 1845 is more detailed and specific in certain areas, reflecting its role as a state constitution.
- Amendment Process: The U.S. Constitution has a more streamlined amendment process, requiring approval from two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the states. The Texas Constitution of 1845 allows amendments through proposals by two-thirds of both legislative houses and approval from a majority of voters.
- Admission into Union: The U.S. Constitution outlines the process for joining the Union, while the Texas Constitution of 1845 addresses the terms of annexation into the United States.
Based on these observations, one conclusion that can be made is that while the Texas Constitution of 1845 shares similarities with the U.S. Constitution, it also incorporates specific provisions tailored to the needs and governance of the state of Texas.
3. To understand why the current Texas Constitution divides power in the executive branch, you can refer to the text of the constitution and analyze the principles it upholds.
The division of power in the executive branch of the Texas Constitution is rooted in the idea of checks and balances. The framers of the constitution sought to prevent the concentration of power in any single individual or office, ensuring a system of shared responsibilities and accountability.
Key provisions in the Texas Constitution that divide power in the executive branch include:
- Plural Executive: Unlike many other state constitutions, the Texas Constitution establishes a plural executive, consisting of multiple elected officials, including the governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, comptroller, land commissioner, agriculture commissioner, and other positions. This distribution of power ensures that no single individual or office can exert unchecked authority.
- Appointment and Removal: The governor's power to appoint and remove executive officers is limited, requiring Senate confirmation for appointments and a specific process for removal. This serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power.
- Independent Boards and Agencies: The Texas Constitution also establishes independent boards and agencies responsible for various aspects of governance, such as education, transportation, and public utilities. These entities operate with a degree of autonomy, further dispersing power and enhancing oversight.
By dividing power in the executive branch, the current Texas Constitution aims to promote a system of shared governance, prevent concentration of power, and ensure accountability within the state government.