Vellman claims that anyone who is capable of requesting euthanasia still has their dignity intact, which is what makes killing them morally wrong.
A. True
B. False
I believe it is false
Vellman uses paternalistic reasons to oppose a legal requirement to honor requests for euthanasia.
A.True
B. False
A. I believe it is true
Hardwig opposes physician assisted suicide, saying only the individuals and/or their families should be involved.
A. true
B. false
i believe it is false
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk00SY6k0so_4bbVXYEAFMkQuU53xIQ%3A1582347515006&ei=-7RQXvILzIC2Bf3Wi6AO&q=velleman+philosophy&oq=vellman+phil&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i13j0i22i30j0i8i13i30.16736.21249..23933...0.2..0.139.599.0j5......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j0i10j0i13i30.kv9EC31T7ks
To determine the answers to these questions, we need to understand the key arguments made by Vellman and Hardwig.
1. Regarding Vellman's claim about euthanasia and dignity, you believe it is false. To confirm your answer, let's consider Vellman's argument. Vellman claims that anyone who is capable of requesting euthanasia still has their dignity intact, which is what makes killing them morally wrong. To assess the claim, we need to evaluate whether dignity is the sole factor that determines the morality of killing someone requesting euthanasia. One way to approach this is by considering alternative ethical perspectives that may consider factors beyond dignity, such as any potential harm to the person and overall well-being. By analyzing these perspectives, you can develop an informed position on whether Vellman's claim is true or false.
2. In terms of Vellman opposing a legal requirement to honor requests for euthanasia on paternalistic grounds, you believe it is true. To confirm your answer, let's examine the argument made by Vellman. Paternalism is the interference with a person's liberty or autonomy for their own well-being or best interests. If Vellman argues against a legal requirement to honor euthanasia requests on paternalistic grounds, it means he believes that overriding the individual's autonomy is justified in order to protect their well-being or best interests. By understanding Vellman's reasoning, you can determine whether he indeed employs paternalistic reasons to oppose such legal requirements.
3. Regarding Hardwig's stance on physician-assisted suicide, you believe it is false that he believes only the individuals and/or their families should be involved in the decision-making process. To confirm your answer, let's analyze Hardwig's perspective. Hardwig opposes physician-assisted suicide, suggesting that only individuals and/or their families should be involved. However, it may be helpful to consider other ethical perspectives that argue for involving medical professionals, such as ensuring a thorough and objective assessment of the patient's condition and the potential implications of the decision. By considering these perspectives, you can form a strong position on whether Hardwig's stance is true or false.
In summary, to determine the correctness of the answers, you need to critically assess the arguments put forth by Vellman and Hardwig, considering alternative perspectives and making an informed judgment based on the ethical considerations involved.