Why did the Articles of Confederation have to be replaced by the Constitution?
A.
The Articles angered state leaders by giving the central government too much power.
B.
The Articles of Confederation were never ratified by the states.
C.
The Articles of Confederation were only designed to last through the Revolutionary War.
D.
The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government.
The correct answer is D. The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government. This led to a lack of unity and coherence among the states, resulting in a variety of issues and challenges. To further explain this, the Articles of Confederation established a decentralized system of government where most of the power resided with the states instead of the central government. The central government had limited abilities and struggled to effectively govern the nation. It had no power to tax, regulate trade, or enforce laws. This weak central government created difficulties in making decisions, resolving disputes, and maintaining order in the country. As a result, it became clear that a stronger and more centralized government was needed, leading to the adoption of the Constitution in 1787.
Read carefully, and let us know what you decide.
https://www.google.com/search?q=why+articles+of+confederation+needed+replacing&oq=why+articles+of+confederation+needed+replacing&aqs=chrome..69i57.10929j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8