Nuclear Power: The Key to our Future here's the story if you want to read it to understand the question.
People all over the world use nuclear energy. Most people would agree that it is a good source of electricity.
Many groups speak in favor of nuclear energy. Actors, athletes, and other famous people have been ambitious in promoting their use. Many of these people have been tireless in their efforts. They have received criticism from people who question its safety.
Some people believe nuclear energy could have negative effects on the environment. It is possible if we are not careful. However, nuclear energy saves natural resources. It gives us more power than other energy sources. Uranium is used to create nuclear energy. Then it becomes electricity. Another way to make electricity is by burning coal. One pound of uranium produces more energy than three million pounds of coal. This means fewer resources are used. Also, burning fuels causes air pollution. Uranium does not cause air pollution.
A nuclear power plant with two reactors.
Nuclear energy is not without problems. What do we do with the used uranium? Uranium gives off radiation or dangerous energy waves. It gives off radiation for a long time. It takes thousands of years before this material is fully decayed. When all the uranium has wasted away, it is safe. Until then, nuclear material must be handled with care. However, it is possible that we will find a safe way to store used nuclear material.
We will not have huge amounts of natural resources such as coal and oil forever. We must find other ways to create energy. People need to share the same vision of how we will get our energy. Nuclear energy is the key to the future!
Select which aspects of “Nuclear Power: The Key to our Future” prevent it from being a biography.
A.
It is written in a compare/contrast structure rather than chronological.
B.
It is written about historical events rather than a person.
C.
It is written based on facts rather than opinions.
D.
It is written in future tense rather than in the past tense.
Biographies are works written about people’s lives. Past tense is generally used in biographies.
Which answer makes sense if you cross out the obviously wrong ones?
To answer this question, we need to understand what a biography is and analyze the given text in order to identify aspects that prevent it from being a biography.
A biography is a genre of literature that tells the story of someone's life, providing an account of their experiences, achievements, and significant events in a chronological manner. It typically contains information about the person's background, personal life, and their impact on society.
Now let's analyze the aspects mentioned in the given options:
- A. It is written in a compare/contrast structure rather than chronological: This aspect suggests that the text is not organized in a typical biographical format. Instead of presenting a chronological account of a person's life, the text appears to be structured around a comparison between nuclear energy and other energy sources.
- B. It is written about historical events rather than a person: This aspect states that the text focuses on historical events rather than an individual's life. Since the text primarily discusses nuclear energy and its pros and cons, it does not revolve around a specific person's life, which is a characteristic of biographies.
- C. It is written based on facts rather than opinions: While biographies are typically based on facts, this aspect alone does not necessarily prevent the text from being a biography. However, it is worth noting that the focus on presenting factual information about nuclear energy rather than a person's life indicates that the text is not a biography.
- D. It is written in future tense rather than in the past tense: Biographies are usually written in the past tense, reflecting events and experiences that have already occurred. In contrast, the given text is written in the future tense, discussing the potential of nuclear energy as a key to the future. This suggests that it is not a biography.
Considering the above analysis, the aspect of the text that prevents it from being a biography is D. It is written in future tense rather than in the past tense. The text's focus on the future implications of nuclear energy rather than a person's life indicates that it does not meet the criteria of a biography.