when prime minister William Pitt told the colonists they would not have to pay for the French and Indian War, how did Pitt imply it would be paid for?
Funds were to be provided by the British (English and colonial taxpayers and heavy borrowing)
https://answersdrive.com/what-was-william-pitt-s-role-in-the-french-and-indian-war-888362
but it was not long after the war when the English decided the American colonists should assume more of the burden,
thx
How much money?? You didn't really say the answer. I look in the book, I look on the internet. Nothing says actually how much????
I agree with Anonymous.
To understand how Prime Minister William Pitt implied that the French and Indian War would be paid for without the colonists directly bearing the cost, we need to delve into some historical context.
During the mid-18th century, the British Empire was engaged in conflicts with France, including the French and Indian War (1754-1763). This war took place mainly in North America, between British colonists and their Native American allies against the French and their Native American allies.
William Pitt, also known as Pitt the Elder, became the British Prime Minister in 1756. He believed that victory in the war was crucial for securing Britain's colonial interests and global dominance. Pitt's strategy focused on the mobilization of British resources and expanding military efforts in North America.
To fund these increased military operations, Pitt employed various methods. He advocated for borrowing large sums of money and raising taxes in Britain. However, when it came to the colonists, he took a different approach. Pitt implied that the colonists would not have to pay for the costs of the war directly.
Instead, he expected the colonists to contribute indirectly through their continued economic growth and expansion. Pitt believed that by pushing the French out of North America, the British Empire would gain control over vast territories with abundant resources. This, in turn, would benefit the colonists by opening up new lands for settlement and trade opportunities.
Pitt hoped that the economic benefits derived from the expanded territories would generate enough revenue through increased trade and taxation to cover the war expenses. He implied that the colonists would bear the cost indirectly by contributing to the economic growth of the empire as a whole.
It is important to note that Pitt's strategy did not explicitly involve direct taxation of the colonists to fund the war. However, tensions between the British government and the colonists over issues of taxation and representation eventually emerged, leading to the American Revolution.