Articles of Confederation
- Did not grant a federal power to tax or regulate commerce
- Did not establish a common currency
- Did not establish an executive or judical branch
What does the list suggest about the drafters of the Articles of Confederation?
The did not think state governments could provide for the general welfare
The did not want a judicial system based upon that of Great Britain
They were uncertain that democracy would continue to be the best type of government
They feared that a strong central government would abuse power***
I agree.
Thank you so much.
You are very welcome.
The list suggests that the drafters of the Articles of Confederation feared that a strong central government would abuse power.
This conclusion can be drawn from the fact that the Articles of Confederation did not grant federal power to tax or regulate commerce. This implies that the drafters did not want to give a central authority too much control over the economy or citizens' financial affairs, likely out of concern that it might lead to abuse of power.
Additionally, the absence of a common currency indicates that the drafters did not want to establish a centralized monetary system. This suggests a desire to keep economic power within the individual states rather than centralizing it at the federal level, possibly due to concerns about the potential for abuse of power.
Finally, the lack of an executive or judicial branch in the Articles of Confederation points to a reluctance to establish strong federal institutions. This could be interpreted as a concern that a powerful central government with an executive and judiciary might become oppressive or tyrannical.
It is important to note that while the lack of these provisions in the Articles of Confederation does suggest a fear of a strong central government, it does not necessarily mean that the drafters did not believe in democracy or the ability of state governments to provide for the general welfare. These inferences are not supported by the given information.