Please read my Reflection and let me know ways to improve it thank you.

Directions:

State whether or not you agree with author Natalie Clarkson's view of the relationship between "Reading Culture" and "Workplace Wellbeing" and justify your stance. Make sure to remain focused on your analysis and response to the Clarkson article. For example, you might not find reading to be stress-relieving.

My Reflection
In the article called “Why promoting a reading culture could improve workplace wellbeing” written by Natalie Clarkson, she discusses the benefit of reading in the workplace. I feel that this would work in some situations such as a if an employee enjoys reading. It will give them a chance for their imagination to run wild and perhaps clear their mind for a little while. On the other hand, if an employee doesn’t not care for reading this could not have a positive effect on them. Although some people find reading a way to relieve stress I do not. I do enjoy reading from time to time. However, I do not find reading stress- relieving.

There are many benefits of reading in the workplace. Reading can help reduce stress because it can relax one’s mind and relieve tension. Reading will improve the workplace by increasing an individual’s vocabulary, knowledge and enhancing one’s intelligence. Additionally, the staff would be more productive and resourceful. Their creative side will soar and cause an overall better workplace. I am a supporter of this concept, but other options should be made available to those who do not enjoy reading.

Reading in some cases may cause an individual stress such as if they have a learning disability. By offering an alternative to reading such as, allowing them to engage in a fun exercise program or listening to some music. This may help them feel relaxed and calm in the same way an individual feels after they read a book they liked.

Promoting reading in the workplace could greatly have a positive impact on employees. If an employee is happy and educated, they will be more productive which in turn will help the company to thrive.

( not sure about a conclusion )

Maybe for a conclusion go over the important parts of your paper's topic, but other than that it looks good!

Overall, your reflection provides a good analysis of Natalie Clarkson's article and your perspective on the relationship between reading culture and workplace wellbeing. However, here are a few suggestions to improve your reflection:

1. Provide a clearer introduction: Start by briefly summarizing the main points of Natalie Clarkson's article and set up your stance on the topic. This will help the reader understand the context of your reflection.

2. Support your opinion with specific examples: When discussing your perspective, provide specific examples or experiences to support your claim that reading may not be stress-relieving for everyone. This will strengthen your argument and make it more compelling.

3. Address counterarguments: While you mention that other options should be made available to those who do not enjoy reading, it would be beneficial to address potential counterarguments and explain why reading still holds value in the workplace despite individual preferences. This will demonstrate a well-rounded understanding of the topic.

4. Expand on the benefits of reading: In the second paragraph, you mention some benefits of reading in the workplace, such as reducing stress and increasing vocabulary. Consider expanding on these points by providing more details or evidence to support them. This will help reinforce your viewpoint.

5. Develop a conclusion: Summarize your main points and reiterate your stance on the relationship between reading culture and workplace wellbeing. You can also briefly address the potential for alternative options and emphasize the importance of considering individual preferences and needs in promoting workplace wellbeing.

By implementing these suggestions, your reflection will become more comprehensive and persuasive. Remember to always support your claims with evidence and provide a balanced analysis of the topic.