I chose False for this but I feel like its wrong.
Whether or not globalization constitutes a new phenomenon depends on how far the web of causation that has resulted in recent technologies and social arrangements that most people associate with the buzz of globalization is extended.
True/False????
What a terrible and convoluted sentence!
I'd vote for false -- but only someone who wrote that sentence would know for sure.
Determining whether a statement is true or false usually involves analyzing the content and context of the statement. In this case, the statement is subjective and relies on the individual's interpretation of globalization.
To assess whether globalization constitutes a new phenomenon, one needs to examine the web of causation linked to recent technologies and social arrangements that are commonly associated with globalization. The statement suggests that the extent of this web of causation determines whether or not globalization is new.
Since the question asks for a true or false response, it is necessary to consider your own interpretation and understanding of the given statement. It is important to review the key points mentioned and consider them in relation to your knowledge of globalization and its historical development.
Ultimately, the determination of whether the statement is true or false depends on your own analysis and understanding of the topic. If you believe that the web of causation discussed in the statement extends far enough to consider globalization a new phenomenon, then you would choose "True." However, if you think that globalization is not solely contingent on recent technologies and social arrangements, or that it has historical roots that stretch back further, then you would choose "False."
Remember, understanding the context and analyzing the information provided are vital when making a decision about the validity of a statement.