How did the location of the ancient cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro contribute to their development?
A.
Their location was near major trade routes.
B.
Their location near rivers provided rich soil that produced plentiful crops.
C.
Their location allowed crops to receive enough rainfall.
D.
Their location provided abundant natural resources and little need to trade.
I really don't know!! helppppp
yes?
of corse they read it how would they know the question if she didin't
To determine how the location of the ancient cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro contributed to their development, we can analyze the options given.
A. Their location was near major trade routes: This is a plausible reason. Being situated near trade routes would have facilitated the exchange of goods, leading to economic growth and cultural exchange.
B. Their location near rivers provided rich soil that produced plentiful crops: This is also a possible reason. The cities were located along the Indus River, which would have provided access to water for irrigation. This would have allowed for the cultivation of crops, leading to agricultural surplus and population growth.
C. Their location allowed crops to receive enough rainfall: While adequate rainfall is essential for agriculture, it does not necessarily explain the development of cities. While rainfall may have played a role, it is not the primary reason for their development.
D. Their location provided abundant natural resources and little need to trade: This option seems less likely. While the surrounding areas may have been rich in natural resources, it is unlikely that the cities developed solely on self-sufficiency without any need for trade.
Considering the given options, options A and B seem to be the most plausible explanations for how the location of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro contributed to their development.