Can someone please help me with this ASAP?! I am stuck!
In 3–5 sentences, construct an argument for why beach nourishment is or is not a viable strategy to manage beach erosion.
Ill just go to brainly since they are helpful
ikr brainly actually helps
here's a list from wikipedia for u to choose from
Advantages
Widens the beach.
Protects structures behind beach.
Storm protection.
Increases land value of nearby properties.
Economic growth through tourism and recreation.
Can serve as additional habitat for a number of species.
Beach nourishment is the only practical environmentally friendly approach to address erosional pressure.
Encourages new vegetation growth that helps stabilize tidal flats.
Disadvantages
Added sand may erode, because of storms or lack of up-drift sand sources.
Expensive and requires repeated application.
Restricted access during nourishment.
Destroy/bury marine life.
Difficulty finding sufficiently similar materials.
Это так раздражает.
Я просто хочу получить ответы???
Rediculous
Certainly! To construct an argument for or against beach nourishment as a viable strategy for managing beach erosion, you can follow these steps:
1. Research: Begin by gathering information on the topic. Look for studies, reports, and expert opinions that examine the effectiveness and drawbacks of beach nourishment projects. Consider factors such as cost, environmental impact, and long-term sustainability.
2. Evaluate the evidence: Analyze the collected information, paying attention to the validity and reliability of your sources. Assess the various benefits, such as shoreline protection and tourism revenue, as well as the potential drawbacks, such as sediment availability, project lifespan, and impacts on marine ecosystems.
3. Frame the argument: Based on your evaluation, develop and articulate your argument. Provide a clear thesis statement explaining whether you believe beach nourishment is a viable strategy for managing beach erosion or not. Support your argument with evidence from your research, making sure to address counterarguments and weaknesses in your stance.
Remember, constructing a well-argumented position requires thorough research, careful evaluation, and an ability to present a well-reasoned perspective.
2. by absorbing energy from storm waves.
3. meeting current needs.
4.floodplain area for public use.
5.Green roofs act as natural insulation.
6.They cause shorelines to move inland.
7. reduced amounts of greenhouse gases
8.groundwater recharge
9. Large, coarse grains of sand should be used since they remain on the beach longer.
10. Trees protect the main crop from overexposure to the sun.
11. The town should build the diversion channels because this option is more cost efficient.
12. Both are hard structures that reduce erosion caused by waves.
Some of these articles should help you.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=dCOhXdzQKcugtQW7pYOoCg&q=+beach+nourishment+&oq=+beach+nourishment+&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.2508.2508..4647...0.0..0.91.91.1......0....2j1..gws-wiz.Up3petguvP0&ved=0ahUKEwjc2oy6wJXlAhVLUK0KHbvSAKUQ4dUDCAg&uact=5