Why is pseudo science not considered real science
Because it doesn't follow convincing facts. It's like climate denials.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=hDiIXd-FJ5m50PEP99u8qAs&q=pseudo+science&oq=pseudo+science&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i131i10i70i249j0i10l9.5998.5998..7998...0.0..0.134.134.0j1......0....2j1..gws-wiz.Q4opOprtqx0&ved=0ahUKEwjf15eD_eXkAhWZHDQIHfctD7UQ4dUDCAg&uact=5
or climate panic
According to what i found, pseudo could mean many things, take a placebo for example. You know how those are not really helpful to us, but helpful to companies who make things like medicine? That could be considered as a pseudo-medicine. think of it like something fake.
Pseudo means not genuine or authentic (real). So it's kinda in the name.
Pseudoscience is not considered real science because it fails to adhere to the fundamental principles and methods of scientific inquiry and does not produce reliable or valid results. Here are a few reasons why pseudoscience is not considered real science:
1. Lack of empirical evidence: Science relies on empirical evidence, which is obtained through well-designed experiments, observations, and data analysis. Pseudoscience often lacks empirical evidence and relies more on anecdotes, unverified claims, or subjective experiences.
2. Non-falsifiability: Science requires hypotheses and theories to be testable and potentially falsifiable. Pseudoscience often makes vague or untestable claims that cannot be proven or disproven through experimentation or observation.
3. Confirmation bias: Pseudoscientific claims often involve cherry-picking evidence that supports pre-existing beliefs or assumptions while disregarding conflicting evidence. In contrast, science encourages critical thinking and considers all available evidence, even if it challenges established ideas.
4. Lack of peer review: Scientific findings are typically subject to rigorous peer review before they can be accepted as valid. Pseudoscience often lacks this crucial peer review process, as claims are often promoted through self-publishing or non-scientific sources.
5. Absence of scientific consensus: In science, consensus among experts in a field is built through repeated verification and replication of experiments. Pseudo scientific claims are often not supported by a wide range of experts or consensus within the scientific community.
To determine whether a particular claim or field of study is pseudoscience or real science, it is essential to critically assess the evidence, evaluate the methodology, and adhere to the scientific method.