without our two great political parties cutting across economic and geogaphic interests, democracy as we know it could never have been made to function. "the author of this statement probably meant to suggest that
a) an important feature of the us political system is the broadly based appeal of the two political parties
b) each polotical party appeals toa different social class
c) only a two party system can function in a democrazy
d) political parties in the united states tend to represent sectional interest
e) there is no significant difference between the democratic and republican parties
i really think that the answer is b
Do you know what this means?
" two great political parties cutting across economic and geogaphic interests"
so the answer could be a
Yes!
Both Democratic and Republican policies represent rich and poor and those in the middle. The represent people in all parts of the country.
To determine the author's likely intention in making this statement, we need to analyze the given options. Let's break them down one by one:
a) An important feature of the US political system is the broadly based appeal of the two political parties.
This option suggests that the author meant to emphasize that the two parties have a wide appeal and attract different groups of people. However, the statement does not necessarily imply this.
b) Each political party appeals to a different social class.
This option suggests that the author meant to convey that the two parties have distinct appeals to different social classes. While this is a possibility, we cannot definitively conclude this based on the given statement alone.
c) Only a two-party system can function in a democracy.
This option implies that the author intended to argue that only a two-party system can function in a democratic system. However, the statement does not explicitly express this view.
d) Political parties in the United States tend to represent sectional interests.
This option suggests that the author is pointing out that political parties in the US primarily represent the interests of specific regions. While this aligns with the author's statement, it does not encompass the full meaning of the statement.
e) There is no significant difference between the Democratic and Republican parties.
This option implies that the author meant to convey that the two major parties in the US are essentially the same, with no meaningful differences. However, the author's statement does not explicitly support this idea.
Considering the given options, the most accurate interpretation of the author's intention in the statement is option d) political parties in the United States tend to represent sectional interests. The author likely meant to suggest that the US political system functions because the two major parties are able to represent diverse regional interests, allowing democracy to operate effectively within the country.