American History- What impact did the Three-Fifths Compromise have on the passage of the Constitution at the Philadelphia Convention?
What impact did the Three-Fifths Compromise have on the passage of the Constitution at the Philadelphia Convention?
A) Politicians needed a compromise that would allow southerners the security of maintaining slavery.
B) Politicians believed a compromise would lead southerners to emancipate their slaves through eschewing representation in the House of Representatives.
C) Politicians believed that a compromise was needed to support the success of northern factory workers.
D) Politicians sought a compromise that would allow northerners to maintain control of the US Senate.
I think the anwser is either C or A? But I am not sure.
Yes. One of those answers is right.
Is the Answer A ?
The Three-Fifths Compromise had a significant impact on the passage of the Constitution at the Philadelphia Convention. To determine the correct answer, let's review the options you mentioned:
A) Politicians needed a compromise that would allow southerners the security of maintaining slavery.
The Three-Fifths Compromise did address the issue of slavery, but it did not directly secure its presence. Instead, it resolved the question of how to count slaves for the purpose of determining a state's population and representation in the House of Representatives.
B) Politicians believed a compromise would lead southerners to emancipate their slaves through eschewing representation in the House of Representatives.
While the Three-Fifths Compromise did involve representation in the House of Representatives, it did not aim to encourage southern slaveholders to emancipate their slaves. Its primary goal was to establish the number of representatives each state would have based on their population, considering that counting the entire slave population would disproportionately benefit the southern states.
C) Politicians believed that a compromise was needed to support the success of northern factory workers.
The Three-Fifths Compromise did not directly relate to the success of northern factory workers, as it primarily dealt with issues of representation and slavery. Therefore, this option does not accurately describe the impact of the compromise.
D) Politicians sought a compromise that would allow northerners to maintain control of the US Senate.
The Three-Fifths Compromise did not specifically address the control of the US Senate. Instead, it focused on the allocation of representatives in the House of Representatives based on population, with the compromise stating that only three-fifths of the slave population would count.
Based on the options provided, the correct answer is A) Politicians needed a compromise that would allow southerners the security of maintaining slavery. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a result of negotiations between northern and southern states, and it allowed for the inclusion of three-fifths of the slave population when determining representation in the House of Representatives. This compromise was sought to ensure that southern states would have enough representation to protect their interests, including the continuation of slavery.
When answering questions about historical events or concepts, it is essential to have a good understanding of the underlying factors and context. In this case, knowing the nature of the Three-Fifths Compromise, its purpose, and the concerns of the different regions of the United States helps in identifying the correct answer.