math

Can someone explain this to me.

Determine if each conclusion is valid or invalid for the given statements.

a. Some expensive books are mystery books. All mystery books are interesting.

Conclusion: Some interesting books are expensive.

Valid or invalid.

b. Some teachers are smart.
Some nice people are smart.

Conclusion: Some teachers are nice people.

Valid or invalid

How about using Venn diagrams?

Draw two intersecting circles, label one "mystery books", the other " expensive books"
Now draw a circle, called "interesting", intersecting the expensive circle, but totally surrounding the mystery circle.

your conclusion was "Some interesting books are expensive"

Do you see an overlap in the 'interesting' and the 'expensive' circles??

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 43
asked by Mae

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. math

    Determine if the argument is valid or invalid. Give a reason to justify answer. If it is cold, then you need a coat. You do not need a coat. It is not cold. (Points : 2) Valid by the law of detachment Valid by the law of

    asked by kozy on May 22, 2011
  2. 9th grade Deductive Reasoning Math

    Given: Angle A and Angle C are complementary to Angle B. Conclusion: Angle is congruent to Angle C. Determine whether each conclusion is valid based on the true conditional given. If not, write invalid. Explain your reasoning.

    asked by Ron on October 11, 2010
  3. Math

    If a rectangle has four congruent sides, it is a square. A square has perpendicular diagonals. Conclusion: A rectangle has diagonals that are always perpendicular. Which of the following is correct The conclusion is valid by the

    asked by Dylan on October 15, 2015
  4. math

    please help... determine if the argument is valid or invalid along with the appropriate form of argument. if harvard hustles then harvard wins harvard wins ___________________ harvard hustles are these statements: valid by law of

    asked by thawk on May 21, 2011
  5. English

    I am a bit stumped here. Working on syllogisms. To be a valid syllogism, the conclusion must be proven by the reasons. We are to decide if te following are valid or invalid. 1. All zebras are striped animals. No zebras are polar

    asked by m on October 10, 2012
  6. math for liberal arts

    construct a truth table to determine whether each argument is valid. Be sure to state whether it is valid or invalid with each question. 1) ~p v q p ____ triangle of dots p^~q

    asked by Sara on November 30, 2013
  7. English-Ms. Sue please

    hypothetical syllogisms can have two valid and two invalid structures. The two valid structures are affirming the antecedent or modus ponens and denying the consequent or modus tollens. The two invalid structures or fallacies are

    asked by m on October 11, 2012
  8. english

    hypothetical syllogisms can have two valid and two invalid structures. The two valid structures are affirming the antecedent or modus ponens and denying the consequent or modus tollens. The two invalid structures or fallacies are

    asked by m on October 11, 2012
  9. Geometry 1 question

    Use the truth table to test the validity of the following argument. If you play varsity sports, then you are dismissed from school an hour early. You are dismissed from school an hour early. Therefore, you are a varsity athlete.

    asked by SkatingDJ on October 13, 2015
  10. CRT205

    Since it is the very nature of terrorism not only to cause immediate damage but also to strike fear in the hearts of the population under attack, one might say that the terrorists were extraordinarily successful, not just as a

    asked by Confused on February 8, 2009

More Similar Questions