Why are bureaucracies impersonal by design?
A.
Impersonal bureaucracies are cost efficient.
B.
Impersonal bureaucracies assure equal treatment of all.
C.
Impersonal bureaucracies assure the success of the merit system.
D.
Personal bureaucracies were not imaginable by the Founding Fathers at the time.
I cant decide before B or C but Im leaning towards B
I vote for B.
To determine why bureaucracies are impersonal by design, we can evaluate each option provided.
Option A suggests that impersonal bureaucracies are cost-efficient. This statement is partially true, as impersonal bureaucracies can streamline processes, minimize biases, and reduce favoritism. However, it is important to note that cost efficiency is not the sole reason for bureaucracies to be impersonal.
Option B suggests that impersonal bureaucracies ensure equal treatment for all individuals. This is a key characteristic of bureaucracies, as they aim to establish consistent rules and procedures that apply to everyone. By removing personal relationships and favoritism, bureaucracies strive to achieve fairness and impartiality.
Option C suggests that impersonal bureaucracies ensure the success of the merit system. This is also a valid point, as an impersonal system emphasizes qualifications, skills, and abilities over personal connections. By basing decisions on merit, bureaucracies can promote competence and efficiency.
Option D proposes that personal bureaucracies were not imaginable by the Founding Fathers at the time. While it is true that the Founding Fathers lived in a different era, their design of bureaucracies inherently aimed to reduce the influence of personal relationships and create a more objective system.
Considering the explanations above, option B appears to provide the most comprehensive explanation for why bureaucracies are impersonal by design. By being impersonal, bureaucracies can minimize biases, ensure equal treatment, and promote fairness.