Prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States was very much divided about entry into World War II. Many isolationists opposed U.S. involvement, while others felt we had a responsibility to act in the face of such aggression.
You will be writing an introductory that justifies the U.S. intervention in the war. Remember, write as if the attack on Pearl Harbor had not yet happened.
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
@ms.sue I am supposed to write an introductory paragraph with a thesis and background on the issue. I agree that the United States should have intervened because of all the global aggression.would i just do some of the events that happened and then write by thesis?
what is the us
Title: Justifying U.S. Intervention: Examining the Pre-Pearl Harbor Divide
Introduction:
The time leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was marked by a deep division within the United States regarding its involvement in World War II. On one hand, advocates of isolationism argued that the nation should abstain from foreign conflicts, emphasizing a policy of non-intervention. On the other hand, proponents of intervention emphasized the responsibility of the United States to combat aggression and protect global stability. This introspective examination aims to justify U.S. intervention in the war, taking into account the prevailing sentiments and underlying factors that influenced the nation's stance, even before the pivotal events at Pearl Harbor.
Section 1: The Threat of Global Aggression
Before the attack on Pearl Harbor, it was evident that World War II had initiated a landscape defined by widespread aggression and expansionist ambitions. Nations, most notably Germany, Italy, and Japan, sought to expand their territories, undermine democratic values, and assert their dominance on an international stage. The United States, as a leading global power committed to democratic principles, had a vested interest in ensuring the preservation of peace, security, and freedom. As such, interventionists argued that the nation had a moral obligation to stand against acts of aggression and prevent an unchecked rise of totalitarian forces.
Section 2: A Responsibility for the Protection of Allies
While the United States remained cautiously neutral before Pearl Harbor, it still had longstanding diplomatic ties and cooperation with several nations directly affected by aggression, notably Great Britain and China. These relationships, coupled with a commitment to collective security, meant that the United States could not simply turn a blind eye to the plight of their allies. Interventionists reasoned that standing united against the forces of tyranny was not only a matter of self-interest but also a clear demonstration of solidarity with those struggling for their freedom. By intervening in the war, the United States would signal its unwavering support for the principles of democracy and lend assistance to beleaguered nations in need.
Section 3: Economic and Strategic Considerations
Comprehending the interconnected nature of global affairs, proponents of intervention recognized the economic implications of World War II. The international trading system, which was essential to the United States' economic prosperity, faced significant disruption due to aggression and the subsequent occupation of key resources and territories. As an industrial and economic powerhouse, U.S. intervention would have aimed to safeguard its economic interests, prevent monopolistic control over vital resources, and foster conditions conducive to global trade and prosperity.
Conclusion:
While the attack on Pearl Harbor undeniably acted as a catalyst for complete American involvement in World War II, it is crucial to acknowledge the pre-existing justifications for U.S. intervention. The division within the nation, between isolationists and interventionists, was shaped by overarching moral concerns, commitments to democratic values, and the need to safeguard economic interests. By examining these facets, we can better understand the complex dynamics that drove the United States towards a definitive role in the war, ultimately culminating in its intervention for collective security, preservation of democratic values, and the pursuit of a more peaceful world.