There is a public debate between the three candidates for U.S. Senate. During the debate, the topics of oil and energy are addressed. Each candidate expressed their view on the issue:
Edgar Eisenhower:
"We need to cut our dependence on foreign oil. Instead, let's use the natural world around us. Think about the sun, wind, water, the heat of the earth, and the crops in our fields. These will make for affordable energy in the 21st century. We should fund research in those areas. Let us also increase tax credits for private investment in clean, renewable sources of energy."
Rebecca Roosevelt:
"We need to cut our dependence on foreign oil and develop a national energy strategy. We should provide tax incentives for producing energy in the U.S. Let's increase U.S. supplies of coal, oil, and natural gas. We should promote environmentally responsible exploration and development of oil and gas reserves. That includes federal land like Alaska's National Wildlife Refuge. Let's also advance clean coal technology."
Terrance Taft:
"Looking at our energy supply is one thing—how we're using it is another. We can drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars. We can invest in more efficient technology for our homes and businesses. These things add up and make a big difference. In fact, in several new buildings associated with Taft Inc., we address our energy needs with locally produced renewable energy. That wouldn't be possible if we were using outdated, energy guzzling technology."
Some voters care deeply about finding alternative fuels to replace traditional energy sources like oil and coal. Which candidates would those voters most likely support?
Rebecca Roosevelt and Edgar Eisenhower
Rebecca Roosevelt only
Terrance Taft only
Edgar Eisenhower and Terrance Taft
I'll be glad to check your answer.
I think its a
No.
um is it d then?
Yes, d.
Based on the views expressed by the candidates, voters who care deeply about finding alternative fuels to replace traditional energy sources like oil and coal would most likely support Edgar Eisenhower and Terrance Taft.
Edgar Eisenhower advocates for using natural sources of energy such as the sun, wind, water, and crops in fields. He also emphasizes the need to fund research in these areas and increase tax credits for private investment in clean, renewable energy sources. This aligns with the interests of voters who are looking for alternative fuels.
Terrance Taft focuses on the importance of how energy is being used and suggests driving smaller, more fuel-efficient cars, and investing in more efficient technology for homes and businesses. He also highlights the use of locally produced renewable energy in his own buildings. These ideas resonate with voters who prioritize energy efficiency and sustainable practices.
On the other hand, Rebecca Roosevelt's viewpoint focuses on increasing U.S. supplies of coal, oil, and natural gas, promoting environmentally responsible exploration and development of reserves, and advancing clean coal technology. While she mentions a national energy strategy and tax incentives for producing energy in the U.S., her emphasis on traditional energy sources may not be as appealing to voters seeking alternatives.
Therefore, the candidates Edgar Eisenhower and Terrance Taft would be more likely to receive support from voters who care deeply about finding alternative fuels.