Im analyzing the case study for the company The big Carrot. The case is confusing and I need to figure out which decision making model the company uses? Through our class we have 4 options. The managment science approach, the carnegie model, the incremental model and finally the garbage can model. Which one is the big carrot using and can anyone give me more notes or facts about their decision maing processes in the company? anything would help?
I dont know about what you read, case stories are often contrived. Worker owned, "Growing from 9 founding partners to a thriving worker-owned business, The Big Carrot is run in the same democratic manner as when we first opened. " usually means a few elected directors, with decision made by votes...
To determine which decision-making model The Big Carrot company uses, you will need to analyze the information provided in the case study. Here's how you can approach this:
1. Read the case study thoroughly: Start by understanding the context of the case and the details provided about the company's decision-making process. Look for any specific methods or approaches mentioned.
2. Identify the characteristics of the decision-making process: Look for indications of how decisions are made within the company. Consider factors such as the involvement of key stakeholders, the level of analysis conducted, the role of data and evidence, and the degree of rationality or intuition involved.
3. Compare with the available decision-making models: With the four models you mentioned – management science approach, Carnegie model, incremental model, and garbage can model – compare their characteristics to the information you identified about The Big Carrot's decision-making process.
- Management Science Approach: This model emphasizes the use of quantitative analysis, mathematical techniques, and optimization tools to make decisions. Look for indications of systematic analysis and data-driven decision-making.
- Carnegie Model: This model emphasizes the involvement of key stakeholders, including individuals and groups affected by decisions. Consider whether the case study mentions a focus on involving stakeholders in decision-making processes.
- Incremental Model: This model involves making decisions gradually, by making small adjustments to existing practices. Look for any indications of incremental changes or a cautious approach to decision-making.
- Garbage Can Model: This model suggests that decisions in organizations are often made haphazardly, without a clear process or rationale. Consider whether the case study describes any instances of chaotic or ambiguous decision-making within the company.
4. Make an informed judgment: Based on your analysis and comparison of the case study with the characteristics of the decision-making models, make an educated guess regarding which model The Big Carrot company is likely using.
It is important to note that since each company's decision-making process can be unique, and the case study may not explicitly mention the model being used, your analysis might involve some speculation. It would be helpful to provide supporting evidence from the case study to justify your chosen model.
Regarding additional notes or facts about The Big Carrot's decision-making process, you'll need to refer to the specific details provided in the case study. Unfortunately, as an AI, I don't have access to external sources or case studies, so I can't provide specific information on The Big Carrot's decision-making processes.