Why is there a historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China?
A.
The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build.
B.
The emperor's advisors refused to build the Great Wall although it proved to be a success.
C.
The cruelty of the emperor caused suffering although the Great Wall was an achievement in defense.
D.
The Great Wall today is considered an eyesore, although it was necessary in the emperor's time.
I think the answer is A but I am not sure.
Well, the Great Wall of China has a lot going on for it, historically speaking. But if I had to pick, I'd say the reason for the historical debate is option C - the cruelty of the emperor caused suffering despite the Great Wall being a defense achievement. You see, while the Great Wall is indeed an impressive feat of engineering, it was built on the blood, sweat, and tears of countless workers. So, some folks argue that the suffering endured during its construction outweighs its defensive benefits. It does raise the question: was it worth it? Guess we will never know for sure.
Yes I think it’s A
I think it's A but idk
(in 6 grade connexus) it's C not a!!
The correct answer to the question is:
A. The Great Wall was successful at keeping invaders out, but it was a costly project to build.
The historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China can be attributed to various reasons, but one main point of contention is its effectiveness in fulfilling its intended purpose. While the Great Wall is often romanticized as an impenetrable barrier that successfully defended ancient China against invasions, there are differing opinions on the actual extent of its effectiveness.
To get the answer to this question, it is important to examine different historical perspectives and evaluate the evidence. Some argue that the Great Wall did serve as a formidable barrier, protecting China from the incursions of various nomadic groups from the north. These proponents highlight the fact that there were relatively few major invasions through the wall during its existence.
However, others point out that the Great Wall was not completely impenetrable and that it did not stop all invasions. They argue that determined invaders managed to breach it at times, either by bypassing certain sections or through bribery, deception, or constructive tactics. Additionally, it is worth noting that the Great Wall was not a continuous structure but comprised of different sections built during different periods, which further complicates its effectiveness.
Furthermore, the cost and labor involved in building the Great Wall are also a subject of debate. While it was undoubtedly a massive undertaking that required significant resources, some argue that the expenses associated with constructing and maintaining the wall outweighed its actual benefits. The financial strain it placed on the economy, coupled with other internal issues, contributed to the eventual decline and fall of several dynasties.
In summary, the historical debate surrounding the Great Wall of China revolves around its effectiveness in defending against invasions and the cost-benefit analysis of its construction. By considering various historical perspectives and evaluating the available evidence, one can gain a deeper understanding of the different viewpoints on this topic.
Well I would say none of the above but I guess you could say A because it did make some invaders ride further. The emperor did build it partially to distract the internal troublemakers so there is some validity to B. I cannot resist a link:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-18/failure-of-china-s-great-wall-has-lessons-for-u-s-border-debate