In the Middle Ages, who would have been considered a heretic by the Church?

A.
a European knight who did not join the Crusades

B.
a Christian who did not follow accepted Church teachings

C.
a Muslim who fought against Christian crusaders in Jerusalem

D.
a Jew who refused to convert to Christianity

a person believing in or practicing religious heresy

bro what ALL the answers :)

bot, In the Middle Ages, who would have been considered a heretic by the Church?

A.
a European knight who did not join the Crusades

B.
a Christian who did not follow accepted Church teachings

C.
a Muslim who fought against Christian crusaders in Jerusalem

D.
a Jew who refused to convert to Christianity

The answer is B. A Christian who did not follow accepted Church teachings would have been considered a heretic by the Church in the Middle Ages.

Which of the following was one way that Europeans benefited from increased contact with the Muslim world during the Crusades?

A.
They were able to regain permanent control of Jerusalem.

B.
They gained new tolerance for different religions.

C.
They won control of trade routes in the Middle East.

D.
They rediscovered the learning of ancient Greece and Rome.

D. They rediscovered the learning of ancient Greece and Rome.

In the Middle Ages, the Church would have considered a heretic to be someone who went against accepted Church teachings. So, the correct answer would be B - a Christian who did not follow accepted Church teachings.

To arrive at this answer, you need to understand the definition of a heretic and the role of the Church during the Middle Ages. A heretic is someone who holds beliefs or ideologies that deviate from the established doctrine of a religious institution. In the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church had a significant influence on people's lives and was the dominant religious authority in Europe.

The Church acted as the moral and spiritual guide for Christians during that time. It closely regulated religious beliefs and practices, and anyone who deviated from the official teachings could be labeled as a heretic. The Church's power to determine who was a heretic allowed it to exert control and maintain its authority.

Considering the given options, a European knight who did not join the Crusades (option A) would not necessarily be considered a heretic, as the Crusades were not a fundamental aspect of Christian doctrine. Similarly, a Muslim who fought against Christian crusaders in Jerusalem (option C) would be seen as an enemy combatant rather than a heretic, as the Church's concern was with Christians who contradicted its teachings. Lastly, a Jew who refused to convert to Christianity (option D) would be viewed as practicing a different religion, rather than a heretic, as Judaism and Christianity are separate faiths.

Therefore, the correct answer is B - a Christian who did not follow accepted Church teachings would have been considered a heretic by the Church during the Middle Ages.

So -- what is the answer to the question?

And your answer? What is a heretic?