Which options correctly describe valid scientific writing?

(Select all that apply)

guided by critical argumentation
written at a university
well organized
based on sound evidence
a,c,d ??

Yes!!

Great job Ryder!

Thank you

To determine which options correctly describe valid scientific writing, let's analyze each option:

a) Guided by critical argumentation: This option is correct. Valid scientific writing involves critical thinking and argumentation, as researchers must carefully evaluate evidence, consider various perspectives, and present their findings with logical reasoning.

b) Written at a university: This option is not necessarily correct. While scientific writing often originates from universities, it can be produced by researchers in various contexts such as private research institutions or industry.

c) Well-organized: This option is correct. Valid scientific writing should be well-structured and organized in a logical manner. This helps readers follow the flow of the information and understand the researcher's arguments and findings.

d) Based on sound evidence: This option is correct. Valid scientific writing is based on reliable and robust evidence. Researchers should support their claims with empirical data, experiments, observations, or other verifiable sources.

Therefore, the correct options that describe valid scientific writing are: a) guided by critical argumentation, c) well-organized, and d) based on sound evidence.