As demonstrated during the Ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A. Raw camera phone video can be edited down and recut to be posted as a short feature on YouTube.
B. Local people who are familiar with their hometowns know how to frame their shots when trouble occurs.
C. Raw camera phone video can be streamed live around the world in real time without government censorship.
D. When unrest develops, anyone with a cell phone has the potential to win fame as the next influential journalist.
Is the answer C?
I know its late but yes c is the answer, I just took the test
Is C the answer?
Is that the right answer?
I think the earth is flat because life is always going forward but when you spin and spin and spin then stop the world spin the other way because 192%{/{(^&+ 1=the earth reminds me of when I use the bathroom. what time is it
Yes, the answer is C. Raw camera phone video can be streamed live around the world in real time without government censorship.
To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the given options and determine which best showcases the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level.
Option A suggests that raw camera phone videos can be edited and posted on YouTube, which does have its benefits, but it does not specifically highlight the advantages of grassroots documentation in the context of the Ukraine uprising.
Option B acknowledges that local people familiar with their hometowns may possess valuable knowledge for capturing events, but it does not explicitly focus on the benefits of grassroots documentation.
Option C emphasizes the real-time streaming of raw camera phone videos without government censorship. This showcases one of the key advantages of grassroots documentation during the Ukraine uprising, as it allowed the events to be broadcasted globally as they were happening, providing uncensored and unfiltered information to the world.
Option D suggests that during times of unrest, anyone with a cellphone has the potential to become an influential journalist. While this statement is true in the context of grassroots documentation, it does not specifically highlight the benefits of doing so during the Ukraine uprising.
Therefore, option C, which mentions the ability to live stream raw camera phone videos without government censorship, best demonstrates the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising.