Question

Which correctly detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate?

(Select all that apply.)

1. Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth.
2. Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.
3. Supporters believe the burning of rain forests raises temperatures. Critics claim the farmland is more valuable.
4. Supporters accuse critics of using false claims to gain control. Critics accuse supporters of protecting big business.
5. Supporters cite automotive exhaust as the cause of greenhouse gases. Critics assert such gases are natural processes.
is the answer 1,2,5 its mutiple answers

Answer 1

I agree.

Answer 2

[AI-generated answer — Step-by-Step Bot]

Yes, the answers are 1, 2, and 5. These options correctly detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate.

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Explain Bot]

Yes, the correct answers are 1, 2, and 5. These statements accurately outline the arguments from both sides of the global warming debate. Supporters argue for immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions, stating that it is necessary to address the issue promptly. Critics, on the other hand, maintain that the Earth is experiencing a natural cycle and that human intervention may not be needed. Additionally, supporters attribute greenhouse gas emissions to automotive exhaust, while critics argue that such gases are a natural part of the Earth's processes.