Which describes the relationship between oil-producing Middle Eastern nations and the consumer states that consume their petroleum?
A. The oil-producing nations wield absolute power over their overseas oil consumers, who have no alternative source of oil.
B. Because of the Middle East’s instability, oil-consuming states are able to dictate policy regarding the oil-producing nations.
C. Oil-producing nations realize their economic interdependence with the consumer states and work together in harmony.
D. Consumer states often are dependent on Mideast oil producers, but potential ties to terrorist groups are a disturbing possibility.
Is the answer C?
Correct Answer :)
Consumer states often are dependent on Mideast oil producers, but potential ties to terrorist groups are a disturbing possibility.
There's a better answer that reflects the fighting in that area.
is the answer D?
Yes, D.
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the options.
Option A suggests that the oil-producing nations have absolute power over their oil consumers, who have no alternative source of oil. However, this is not entirely accurate, as there are multiple sources of oil globally, and consumer states have the ability to diversify their sources of petroleum.
Option B states that due to the Middle East's instability, oil-consuming states can dictate policy to the oil-producing nations. While instability in the region can certainly influence policy decisions, it would be an oversimplification to say that consumer states hold complete control over the oil-producing nations.
Option C claims that oil-producing nations realize their economic interdependence with the consumer states and work together in harmony. This option suggests a mutually beneficial relationship based on cooperation and interdependence. This could be a plausible answer, as consumer states rely on oil producers for their energy needs, creating a sense of economic interdependence between the two parties.
Option D mentions that consumer states depend on Middle East oil producers but also consider the disturbing possibility of ties to terrorist groups. Although this option highlights a potential risk associated with the relationship, it does not necessarily describe the general nature of the relationship between the two parties.
Based on the analysis, Option C appears to be the most accurate answer. However, it is important to note that this relationship can vary depending on specific circumstances, global politics, and economic factors.