Through the statement "the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the Constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply," how did this case change the role of the judiciary in a controversial way?
a)It established limitations on judicial review.
b)It minimized the effects of judicial oversight.
c)It disseminated information about judicial oversight.
d)It contributed to the establishment of judicial review.
is it d?
correct.
thank u
Yes, the correct answer is d) It contributed to the establishment of judicial review.
In order to understand why this case changed the role of the judiciary, it is helpful to know the background. The statement you mentioned comes from a landmark United States Supreme Court case called Marbury v. Madison, decided in 1803. In this case, the Court was faced with the question of whether it had the power to interpret the Constitution and declare an act of Congress unconstitutional.
The Court, led by Chief Justice John Marshall, held that it did have this power, laying the foundation for the principle of judicial review. In the opinion, Chief Justice Marshall stated, "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is." This means that it is the role of the courts to interpret the Constitution and determine whether laws passed by the legislature are in accordance with it.
By establishing this power of judicial review, Marbury v. Madison significantly changed the role of the judiciary. Prior to this case, the idea that the courts had the authority to declare acts of the legislature unconstitutional was not universally accepted. The decision in Marbury v. Madison firmly established the principle that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that it is the duty of the courts to uphold its provisions, even if that means striking down laws passed by the legislative branch.
So, to recap, the case of Marbury v. Madison contributed to the establishment of judicial review, whereby the courts have the power to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws passed by the legislature. Therefore, the correct answer is d) It contributed to the establishment of judicial review.