The Kansas-Nebraska Act continued the ideas of which of the following?

A. Missouri Compromise
B. Compromise of 1850
C. Free Soil Party
D. Dred Scott v. Sanford

1. B - Compromise of 1850

2. B - Congress could not decide whether to allow slavery in the states.
3. C - To keep slavery out of the territories.
4. B - John Calhoun

I think its A. because......

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The Act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which prohibited slavery north of latitude 36°30´. It says Missouri Compromise so i think A.

Unknown is right guys, i got 100% thanks!! <3

I have a question if a moose eats a grenade under water (and the water is below -230 degrees F) what would happen?.........and also I would like the answer plz

Unknown is CORRECT YAYYYYYYYYyyyYyyYYyy

@the great potato

If a moose were to eat a grenade underwater, and the water temperature is below -230 degrees Fahrenheit, several things would happen:

The moose's digestive system and the grenade would be subjected to extreme cold temperatures. At such low temperatures, the moose's bodily functions and the chemical reactions within the grenade would slow down significantly.

The grenade would likely freeze solid, which could potentially prevent it from detonating, as the components within the grenade would be less likely to function properly in such extreme cold.

The moose would also be at risk of hypothermia or other cold-related health issues due to the freezing temperatures of the water.

It's important to note that this scenario is highly unlikely to occur naturally, and it's not recommended to put any living creature in such a dangerous situation. It's always best to prioritize the safety and well-being of wildlife.

To determine which ideas were continued by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, we first need to understand the context of this act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854 and it allowed for the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not they would allow slavery. This decision was made through popular sovereignty, which meant that the residents of these territories would vote on whether to be admitted as a free or slave state.

Now, let's consider the ideas associated with each of the given options:

A. Missouri Compromise: The Missouri Compromise of 1820 had established a line across the Louisiana Territory, stating that any state admitted to the Union above the line would be free and any state below the line would be a slave state. This compromise was intended to maintain a balance between slave and free states. However, the Kansas-Nebraska Act directly repealed the Missouri Compromise by allowing popular sovereignty in the territories, which could potentially lead to the spread of slavery into areas previously designated as free.

B. Compromise of 1850: The Compromise of 1850 dealt with various issues surrounding slavery and the territories gained from the Mexican-American War. It included provisions such as the Fugitive Slave Act, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners. While the Compromise of 1850 addressed different aspects of slavery, it did not involve the same concept of popular sovereignty as the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

C. Free Soil Party: The Free Soil Party was a political party active in the mid-19th century opposing the expansion of slavery into the Western territories. The party aimed to keep newly acquired territories as free states. Although the Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed for popular sovereignty, it did not directly align with the beliefs of the Free Soil Party, as it opened up the possibility of slavery entering previously free territories.

D. Dred Scott v. Sanford: Dred Scott v. Sanford was a Supreme Court decision in 1857 that ruled that enslaved people were property and not citizens, and therefore could not sue for their freedom. While this decision was significant in further entrenching the institution of slavery, it did not continue the ideas of the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Given the context and the ideas associated with each option, the Kansas-Nebraska Act did continue the ideas of popular sovereignty, which was the concept that the residents of a territory could decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. Therefore, the correct choice would be:

C. Free Soil Party

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=yFkYXN-THpCMsQWopLjADg&q=Kansas-Nebraska+Act+&btnK=Google+Search&oq=Kansas-Nebraska+Act+&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i131j0j0i20i263j0l7.4288.4288..4879...1.0..0.126.246.0j2......0....1j2..gws-wiz.....6..35i39.Qa9vOUbf4dg