why was it important that civil service positions were not hereditary?

A.so officials would be well-qualified.
B.so officials would be diverse.
C.so officials would not all know each other.
D.so officials would be well-traveled

is it c

What is your answer?

my answer is D.

What is the dang answer.

PLEASE I NEED THIS ANWSER

The correct answer is A. So officials would be well-qualified.

Civil service positions being hereditary means that these positions would be passed down from generation to generation within a family. This can lead to officials being appointed based on their family connections and not necessarily on their qualifications or abilities.

It was important that civil service positions were not hereditary because it ensured that officials would be well-qualified. By opening up these positions to all individuals, it allowed for a more competitive selection process, encouraging individuals to demonstrate their skills, knowledge, and qualifications to be considered for these roles. This promoted the hiring of officials based on merit rather than family ties, leading to a more capable and competent civil service.

No. Definitely not. We still have similar civil service rules for the same reason.