The special protection the courts once granted property rights has been
reduced so the government can
A.regulate business more than in the past
B. construct national infrastructure plans
C. force redistribution of income
D. implement collective laws
I think it's B. Can someone please confirm? Thanks
restrict businesses less than in the paste
To confirm the correct answer, let's analyze each option:
A. Regulate business more than in the past: This option doesn't align with the statement in the question, as it suggests that the reduction in special protection granted to property rights would result in increased regulation of businesses. However, the question implies the opposite.
B. Construct national infrastructure plans: This option seems plausible. If the courts reduce special protection for property rights, it could allow the government to prioritize constructing national infrastructure plans that might require the use of private property. Therefore, it could be the correct answer.
C. Force redistribution of income: This option doesn't directly relate to the reduction in special protection for property rights. Redistribution of income typically involves taxation and welfare policies, which might not be connected to the courts' treatment of property rights.
D. Implement collective laws: This option is more ambiguous since "collective laws" can have different interpretations. Without further context, it is unclear how this option directly relates to the reduction in protections for property rights.
Based on this analysis, Option B, "Construct national infrastructure plans," appears to be the most reasonable choice. However, it's essential to consider any additional information or context provided in the question or surrounding text to ensure the accuracy of the answer.