Why was every colony (except Georgia) unhappy with the Proclamation of 1763? Why were Georgia's colonists not as angry about it as the other colonies? I know I asked this question like 45 minutes ago but I really need the answer for a study guide and I have a test tomorrow over it. And if someone does answer please explain it to me so I can understand it.

https://georgiainfo.galileo.usg.edu/thisday/gahistory/10/07/proclamation-of-1763-issued

The proclamation, and two following, greatly expanded Georgia's boundries, they gained much from the proclamation.
Read the link.

why were the colonist upset about the proclamation line

lol ppl stil haven't responded

^ pain

Georgia was ruled directly by the king through a council of elected social studies help asap which of the following effects of the French and Indian war most contributed to smuggling in the colonies? Increased taxes from the crown enforcement of the navigation acts presence of British soldiers in the colony's removal of the other country.

The Proclamation of 1763 was issued by the British government following the end of the French and Indian War. It stated that the colonists were not allowed to settle west of the Appalachian Mountains, in order to prevent conflicts with Native American tribes and to establish control over the region.

Here's an explanation of why every colony (except Georgia) was unhappy with the Proclamation of 1763:

1. Land Claims: Many colonists had fought in the war and believed they deserved land grants as a reward. The Proclamation seemed to disregard their efforts by prohibiting westward expansion.

2. Economic Opportunities: The western territories held significant economic potential, including fertile land, natural resources, and trade routes. By blocking colonial expansion, the Proclamation limited the colonists' chances for economic growth.

3. Smuggling: Some colonists relied on smuggling activities to evade British trade regulations. The Proclamation threatened their ability to operate in the western territories, potentially disrupting their illicit trade routes.

4. Loss of Freedom: The proclamation was seen as a violation of the colonists' rights and freedoms. The British government imposing restrictions on their movement and settlement was seen as an overreach of power, leading to a sense of resentment among the colonists.

As for Georgia, its colonists were not as angry about the Proclamation of 1763 for the following reasons:

1. Buffer against Spanish Florida: Georgia was located on the southern border of the British colonies, adjacent to Spanish Florida. The Proclamation helped secure Georgia's position by creating a barrier between them and the potentially hostile Spanish forces.

2. Protection from Native American conflicts: Georgia had significant tensions with Native American tribes, especially the Creek and Cherokee nations. The Proclamation aimed to prevent conflicts between colonists and Native Americans, which Georgia appreciated since it was frequently targeted by Native American attacks.

3. Recent settlement: Georgia was the youngest colony and had relatively fewer settlers compared to the others. Therefore, the restriction on westward expansion did not affect them to the same extent as the more established colonies.

In summary, the Proclamation of 1763 angered the colonies (except Georgia) due to its infringement on their land claims, economic opportunities, freedoms, and smuggling activities. Georgia's colonists were less upset because the Proclamation provided them with some protection against Spain and Native American conflicts, and as a newer colony, their westward expansion was not as advanced as the other colonies.