Serious bicyclists say that if you reduce the weight of a bike, it is more effective if you do so in the wheels rather than in the frame. Why would reducing weight in the wheels make it easier on the bicyclist than reducing the same amount in the frame?

More energy goes into the wheels rotating than the moving the frame, so if wheel mass is reduced, that energy is reduced.

Reducing weight in the wheels of a bicycle can make it easier for a cyclist compared to reducing the same amount of weight in the frame for several reasons:

1. Rotational Inertia: The wheels contribute significantly to the rotational inertia of the bicycle. Rotational inertia is the resistance to changes in rotation. By reducing the weight in the wheels, it decreases the rotational inertia and makes it easier for the cyclist to accelerate, decelerate, and change direction.

2. Rolling Resistance: The weight of the wheels affects the rolling resistance of the bicycle. Rolling resistance is the force required to keep the wheels moving forward. Lighter wheels have less inertia and require less effort to overcome rolling resistance. Thus, reducing the weight in the wheels can lead to lower rolling resistance and improve overall efficiency.

3. Suspension: Lighter wheels improve the performance of suspension systems. When riding on rough terrain or encountering bumps, the lighter wheels can respond more quickly and effectively absorb the impact. This results in a smoother ride and better control for the cyclist.

4. Handling and Agility: Lighter wheels can enhance the handling and agility of a bicycle. With reduced weight in the wheels, the bike becomes more responsive to steering inputs, making it easier for the cyclist to maneuver through corners and switch directions.

While reducing weight in the frame can also have some benefits, such as improved strength-to-weight ratio and overall stability, focusing on reducing weight in the wheels provides more noticeable advantages for cyclists in terms of responsiveness, efficiency, and comfort.

Reducing weight in the wheels of a bicycle can have a greater impact on performance compared to reducing the same amount of weight in the frame. This is because the wheels are rotating components and their weight affects not only the overall weight of the bike, but also the rotational inertia.

Rotational inertia is a property of rotating objects, such as wheels, and it determines how much effort is required to accelerate or decelerate them. The higher the rotational inertia, the more energy is needed to initiate changes in speed or direction.

When riding a bike, the rotational inertia of the wheels plays a significant role in the effort required to accelerate, maintain speed, and change direction. The weight of the wheels directly affects the rotational inertia and, therefore, the bike's responsiveness.

By reducing weight in the wheels, there is a noticeable decrease in rotational inertia. This means that it takes less effort to accelerate the wheels, resulting in quicker acceleration and improved responsiveness. It also requires less energy to maintain speed since the wheels are lighter and encounter less resistance.

On the other hand, reducing weight in the frame primarily affects the total weight of the bike, which can still impact the overall effort required to pedal, especially during uphill climbs or when accelerating from a stop. However, because the frame is a static component that doesn't rotate, the effect on rotational inertia is minimal compared to reducing weight in the wheels.

In summary, reducing weight in the wheels of a bicycle has a more prominent impact on performance because it lowers the rotational inertia, leading to improved acceleration, responsiveness, and efficiency, particularly in situations where speed changes and maneuverability are crucial, such as during competitive cycling or hilly terrain.