Which most accurately evaluates how the Mexican government’s refusal to ratify the Treaties of Velasco impacted the movement towards Texan independence?
It had some impact; as it was considered a territory, Texas could not organize an independent army.
It had no impact; the US threatened war against Mexico unless Texan independence was granted.
It had a significant impact; the world refused to recognize Texas as a sovereign nation.
It had little impact; Texan independence came with the defeat of General Santa Anna.
I think it is C
I disagree.
https://www.google.com/search?q=treaty+of+velasco&oq=treaty+of+velasco&aqs=chrome..69i57.7877j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
ok is it D?
To evaluate how the Mexican government's refusal to ratify the Treaties of Velasco impacted the movement towards Texan independence, we need to understand the context and historical events surrounding this decision.
The Treaties of Velasco were signed in May 1836 between the interim government of the Republic of Texas and Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna. These treaties secured the Texan victory after the Battle of San Jacinto and established the terms for the withdrawal of Mexican troops from Texas. However, the Mexican government refused to officially ratify these treaties.
Option A states that the Mexican government's refusal to ratify the Treaties of Velasco impacted the movement towards Texan independence because, as a territory, Texas could not organize an independent army. This option suggests that the lack of official recognition from the Mexican government may have hindered Texas' ability to form its own military force. However, it does not directly address the impact on the movement towards independence.
Option B suggests that the Mexican government's refusal had no impact on the movement towards Texan independence because the United States threatened war against Mexico unless Texan independence was granted. This option implies that the pressure from the United States played a significant role in achieving Texan independence, regardless of the Mexican government's refusal to ratify the treaties. However, it does not address the impact in terms of international recognition or other factors.
Option C argues that the Mexican government's refusal had a significant impact because the world refused to recognize Texas as a sovereign nation. This option suggests that the lack of recognition from other nations impeded the progress of the Texan independence movement. It implies that the refusal to ratify the treaties damaged Texas' credibility and legitimacy on the international stage.
Option D claims that the Mexican government's refusal had little impact on the movement towards Texan independence because Texan independence came with the defeat of General Santa Anna. This option suggests that Texan independence was primarily achieved through military victories like the Battle of San Jacinto. It downplays the significance of the Treaties of Velasco and the Mexican government's refusal in the overall movement towards independence.
Given this analysis, option C seems to be the most accurate assessment of the impact of the Mexican government's refusal to ratify the Treaties of Velasco. The lack of international recognition placed constraints on Texas' path to sovereignty, indicating that it had a significant impact on the movement towards Texan independence.