Which accurately describes differences between feudal Europe and Japan?
(Select all that apply.)
European knights acquired lands from their lords, whereas samurai did not acquire lands from their daimyo.
Samurai followed moral codes regarding respect for elders, whereas European knights followed the rules of chivalry.
Japanese feudalism was based on the moral ideas of Confucius, whereas
Europe was strengthened by the Catholic Church.
European feudalism encouraged literacy among peasants, whereas Japanese lords (daimyo) banned and burned books.
I don't know which one
Please tell me all the answers if I don't get a of them right I'm gonna fail please.
is it a and c?
Well, well, well, let's take a closer look at these options, shall we?
First off, European knights did indeed acquire lands from their lords. They would receive land in exchange for their military service and loyalty. So, that one seems accurate.
Now, samurai in Japan did not technically acquire lands from their daimyo. Instead, they were granted a stipend or income from their daimyo for their service. So, we can say that the samurai did not acquire lands in the same way that European knights did.
As for following moral codes, that's right, samurai in Japan adhered to a strict moral code called Bushido, which emphasized honor, respect, and discipline. On the flip side, European knights followed the code of chivalry, which included virtues like bravery, loyalty, and courtly love.
Moving on, Japanese feudalism was indeed influenced by the moral ideas of Confucianism. These ideas stressed hierarchical relationships, loyalty, and respect for authority. On the other hand, Europe during this period was significantly influenced by the Catholic Church, which played a central role in strengthening political and social structures.
Lastly, European feudalism did lead to an increase in literacy among peasants. Since they often worked on the estates of lords, they had more access to education and resources. However, Japanese lords, or daimyo, did not encourage literacy among peasants and even banned and burned books.
So, to sum it up, the accurate differences between feudal Europe and Japan are that European knights acquired lands from their lords, while samurai did not acquire lands from their daimyo. Samurai followed moral codes regarding respect for elders, while European knights followed the rules of chivalry. Japanese feudalism was influenced by the moral ideas of Confucius, while Europe was strengthened by the Catholic Church. Lastly, European feudalism encouraged literacy among peasants, while Japanese lords (daimyo) banned and burned books.
To determine the differences between feudal Europe and Japan accurately, let's go through each statement and evaluate its accuracy:
1. European knights acquired lands from their lords, whereas samurai did not acquire lands from their daimyo.
To verify this statement, we need to understand the feudal systems in both Europe and Japan. In feudal Europe, knights were granted land in exchange for military service to their lords. This arrangement was known as the "feudal contract." In contrast, samurai in Japan did receive land from their daimyo, forming a similar relationship as European knights and their lords. Therefore, this statement is not accurate.
2. Samurai followed moral codes regarding respect for elders, whereas European knights followed the rules of chivalry.
This statement is accurate. In Japan, samurai adhered to a strict moral code known as Bushido, which included principles such as loyalty, honor, and respect for one's elders. On the other hand, European knights followed the code of chivalry, which emphasized virtues such as courage, generosity, and loyalty.
3. Japanese feudalism was based on the moral ideas of Confucius, whereas Europe was strengthened by the Catholic Church.
To evaluate this statement, we need to understand the influence of religious and philosophical ideas in both regions. In Japan, Confucianism played a significant role in shaping the moral principles and governance of the feudal system. However, the influence of the Catholic Church in Europe was more significant than just strengthening feudalism. The Catholic Church was a central authority that provided moral guidance, influenced politics, and controlled vast wealth. Therefore, this statement is partially accurate, as Japanese feudalism was influenced by Confucianism, but the Catholic Church's influence in Europe extended beyond strengthening feudalism.
4. European feudalism encouraged literacy among peasants, whereas Japanese lords (daimyo) banned and burned books.
To determine the accuracy of this statement, we need to consider the attitudes towards literacy and the prohibition of books in feudal Europe and Japan. In feudal Europe, education and literacy were significant in monastic communities, where monks preserved knowledge and copied books. However, common peasants generally had limited access to education and literature. In Japan, some daimyo imposed restrictions on the printing and distribution of books to control knowledge dissemination. However, it is essential to note that literacy levels among peasants varied in both regions, and sweeping generalizations are not accurate. Therefore, this statement is partially accurate, as European feudalism had limited literacy among peasants, and some Japanese daimyo restricted books.
Based on this analysis, the accurately described differences between feudal Europe and Japan are as follows:
- Samurai followed moral codes regarding respect for elders, whereas European knights followed the rules of chivalry.
- Japanese feudalism was based on the moral ideas of Confucius, whereas Europe was influenced by the Catholic Church.