from Miranda v. Arizona
Which kind of confession is declared admissible by this ruling?
a confession not evoked by police questioning
a confession not properly recorded by police
a confession that also implicates someone else
a confession made in private to one's attorney
Is it A?
Right.
Thanks
You're welcome.
No, it is not option A. In the Miranda v. Arizona ruling, a confession not evoked by police questioning is generally considered an involuntary confession and is not admissible in court.
The correct answer is option C: a confession that also implicates someone else. In the Miranda v. Arizona case, the Supreme Court ruled that any confession made by a suspect during a custodial interrogation would only be admissible if the suspect was informed of their right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the warning that anything they say can be used against them in court. This ruling applies to any confession, whether it implicates someone else or not.